HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Appcast · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Appcast

118Judge labels
29First choices
20Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
36% in Job advertising for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 109 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 27 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Appcast for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Job advertising and distributionTalent acquisition15%3 of 10911%27accepted challenger
Recruitment marketing and career sitesTalent acquisition0%27 of 8118%11accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Appcast yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Appcast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512003
GPT-5.4 mini01214
Gemini 3.5 Flash02013
Perplexity Sonar02103
Grok 4.1 Fast01315
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash22015
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K210203
GLM 4.7 FlashX03115
MiniMax M2.520002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct36 labels12
Paraphrase6 labels2
Comparative22 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained30 labels11
Scale-constrained12 labels4
Negative12 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative118 labels in all, every segment counted; 29 of the 38 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Appcast appears to be the most budget-friendly option with its low minimum spend ($200-300), pay-per-applicant model, and no software fees” Kimi K2 · Job advertising · budget prompt · first choice
“Appcast – largest publisher breadth, pay-per-application model, strong ATS integrations (best for mid-size→enterprise breadth)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Job advertising · scale prompt · first choice
“### 1. Appcast ... Best for: Small businesses wanting performance-based pricing with low upfront costs” MiniMax M2.5 · Job advertising · budget prompt · first choice
“Appcast appears to be particularly friendly for budget-conscious companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Job advertising · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise-heavy ones like Joveo/Appcast—they excel at cost savings *at scale* ... but minimums are too high for limited budgets.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · budget prompt · hard negative
“Best for large enterprise spend optimization: Appcast, Joveo, or Recruitics, but these are generally more enterprise-oriented” GPT-5.4 mini · Job advertising · budget prompt · soft negative
“frequently flagged by smaller businesses and mid-sized teams... High Cost & Poor ROI” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“carefully review their minimum spend limits to see if they fit a 500-person budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Appcast, over the 117 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Appcast was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Joveo92 of 11716Compare →
Recruitics43 of 1170Not in the top three
Radancy39 of 1171Not in the top three
Phenom27 of 1174Not in the top three
Indeed25 of 1172Not in the top three
DE Amplify24 of 1176Not in the top three
Beamery22 of 1170Not in the top three
Adway20 of 1174Not in the top three
ZipRecruiter19 of 1173Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Appcast. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 106 of the 117 answers that named Appcast and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Appcast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Appcast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at appcast.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.