Every category where a model named Beamery for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	77 of 77	58%	31	criticized challenger
Recruitment marketing and career sites	Talent acquisition	0%	20 of 81	17%	24	accepted challenger
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	157 of 162	50%	8	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	0%	28 of 129	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%
Recruiting CRM and sourcing	Talent acquisition	0%	87 of 88	80%	5	under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20%
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	0%	30 of 84	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Beamery yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Beamery across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	2	4
GPT-5.4 mini	2	1	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	9	11
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	1	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	5	2	9
Mistral Small	2	0	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	5	3	5	13
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	2	1	5
Kimi K2	2	2	6	10
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	5	2	8
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct48 labels1

Paraphrase24 labels8

Comparative84 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained34 labelsNone

Scale-constrained20 labelsNone

Negative34 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative244 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Beamery if you are a global enterprise focused on skills-based hiring, internal mobility, and long-term talent communities.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Beamery is an AI-driven Talent Lifecycle Management platform that empowers organizations to attract and retain top talent” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Beamery — A "talent lifecycle management" platform strong on CRM, talent analytics, and AI” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best For: Data-driven organizations focused on workforce intelligence and personalized CRM.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Recruitment marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“five-figure-monthly floors and 6 to 12 month rollouts make enterprise platforms like Beamery impractical for recruiting agencies or mid-market teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Skills intelligence · budget prompt · hard negative

“Beamery, with average annual contracts around $220,000... make it impractical for recruiting agencies or mid-market teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · hard negative

“What to Avoid Enterprise platforms like Eightfold and Beamery are typically overkill and out of budget” MiniMax M2.5 · Talent intelligence · budget prompt · hard negative

“What to Avoid in the Mid-Market - Enterprise suites (Beamery, Phenom, iCIMS AI):” Kimi K2 · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Beamery, over the 244 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beamery was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Phenom168 of 24419Not in the top three

Eightfold AI160 of 24439Not in the top three

Gloat85 of 24411Not in the top three

SeekOut71 of 2445Not in the top three

Gem64 of 24416Not in the top three

Greenhouse48 of 2443Not in the top three

hireEZ47 of 2444Not in the top three

Pin44 of 24417Not in the top three

Avature44 of 2443Not in the top three

Joveo41 of 2445Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Beamery. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 210 of the 244 answers that named Beamery and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com103

g2.com97

pin.com97

metaview.ai83

guideflow.com64

selectsoftwarereviews.com58

bestrecruitingtools.com57

hrtechsaas.com56

hiretruffle.com52

joveo.com45

712 of the 712 domain citations in answers naming Beamery came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

metaview.ai/resources/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms60

pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-platforms58

learn.g2.com/best-talent-intelligence-software47

pin.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software47

learn.g2.com/best-recruitment-marketing-platforms46

guideflow.com/blog/talent-intelligence-software39

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruitment-marketing-software39

joveo.com/blog/top-recruitment-marketing-platforms38

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Beamery's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Beamery, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at beamery.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.