HR AI Index
Index Vendors › DE Amplify · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

DE Amplify

26Judge labels
6First choices
1Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Job advertising for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 109 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DE Amplify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Job advertising and distributionTalent acquisition5%6 of 10911%9under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DE Amplify yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DE Amplify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained15 labels5
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. DE Amplify (DirectEmployers) - Uses a pay-for-performance model... Best for high-volume and hard-to-fill roles, especially for employers focused on cost-per-hire and budget control” Mistral Small · Job advertising · budget prompt · first choice
“the best programmatic job advertising platform is DirectEmployers DE Amplify” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Job advertising · budget prompt · first choice
“A managed programmatic job advertising platform ... focused on transparency and no long-term contracts” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Job advertising · comparative prompt · alternative
“Pay-for-performance (per applicant/call), no hidden fees, budget transparency.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Skip Talroo, PandoLogic, and DirectEmployers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Job advertising · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DE Amplify, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DE Amplify was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Appcast24 of 268Not in the top three
Joveo19 of 267Not in the top three
Indeed10 of 260Not in the top three
JobTarget9 of 264Not in the top three
Radancy9 of 261Not in the top three
Recruitics8 of 260Not in the top three
Adway6 of 261Not in the top three
Talroo6 of 260Not in the top three
ZipRecruiter5 of 260Not in the top three
Phenom4 of 260Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DE Amplify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 26 answers that named DE Amplify and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as DE Amplify

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as DE Amplify; a claim can dispute any of them.
DE Amplify (DirectEmployers) 3DirectEmployers DE Amplify 3DE Amplify (by DirectEmployers) 1DirectEmployers 1JobTarget/DE Amplify 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DE Amplify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DE Amplify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack