HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Checkr · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Checkr

157Judge labels
37First choices
7Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
43% in Background screening for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 59 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
7 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 49 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In background screening · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Checkr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Background screeningTalent acquisition43%1 of 596%49endorsed leader
HR compliance and policy managementCore HR and payroll0%29 of 840%5under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Checkr yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Checkr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.520103
GPT-5.4 mini40004
Gemini 3.5 Flash23005
Perplexity Sonar11204
Grok 4.1 Fast32005
Mistral Small11204
DeepSeek V4 Flash23117
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash30003
Kimi K232106
GLM 4.7 FlashX30014
MiniMax M2.521216

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct31 labels15
Paraphrase29 labels14
Comparative41 labels24not counted in share
Budget-constrained30 labels7
Scale-constrained12 labels1
Negative14 labels6not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative157 labels in all, every segment counted; 37 of the 67 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Checkr Professional and GoodHire Complete are frequently recommended due to their balance of features, ease of use, and compliance support” Mistral Small · Background screening · direct prompt · first choice
“Checkr consistently ranks as a top background check provider across industries, delivering 89% of criminal checks in just one hour” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Background screening · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Checkr Professional offers the best balance of features, integrations, and reliability.” MiniMax M2.5 · Background screening · direct prompt · first choice
“Checkr solidified its place as the top choice for both automated enterprise screening and user-friendly SMB hiring.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Background screening · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Complaints have risen sharply: 153 in 2023, 187 in 2024, and 469 in 2025... errors in reports and difficulty disputing incorrect information.” MiniMax M2.5 · Background screening · negative prompt · hard negative
“watch out for additional court/DMV pass-through fees that can add 40–70% to the base price” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Background screening · budget prompt · soft negative
“their automated matching algorithms are a frequent source of false hits” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Background screening · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Checkr, over the 157 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Checkr was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HireRight88 of 15710Not in the top three
First Advantage74 of 15717Not in the top three
Accurate Background61 of 1571Not in the top three
Sterling58 of 1571Not in the top three
BackgroundChecks.com39 of 1576Not in the top three
Verified First25 of 1573Not in the top three
Bchex16 of 1570Not in the top three
Mitratech AssureHire14 of 1571Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Checkr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 138 of the 157 answers that named Checkr and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Checkr

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Checkr; a claim can dispute any of them.
Checkr Professional 2Checkr (incorporating GoodHire) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Checkr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Checkr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at checkr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.