| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Background screening | Talent acquisition | 43% | 1 of 59 | 6% | 49 | endorsed leader |
| HR compliance and policy management | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 29 of 84 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Rippling at 16% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Checkr Professional and GoodHire Complete are frequently recommended due to their balance of features, ease of use, and compliance support” Mistral Small · Background screening · direct prompt · first choice
“Checkr consistently ranks as a top background check provider across industries, delivering 89% of criminal checks in just one hour” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Background screening · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Checkr Professional offers the best balance of features, integrations, and reliability.” MiniMax M2.5 · Background screening · direct prompt · first choice
“Checkr solidified its place as the top choice for both automated enterprise screening and user-friendly SMB hiring.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Background screening · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Complaints have risen sharply: 153 in 2023, 187 in 2024, and 469 in 2025... errors in reports and difficulty disputing incorrect information.” MiniMax M2.5 · Background screening · negative prompt · hard negative
“watch out for additional court/DMV pass-through fees that can add 40–70% to the base price” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Background screening · budget prompt · soft negative
“their automated matching algorithms are a frequent source of false hits” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Background screening · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 138 of the 157 answers that named Checkr and are not a share of its labels.
425 of the 532 domain citations in answers naming Checkr came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Checkr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Checkr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at checkr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.