HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Divvy · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Divvy

2Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Divvy was named 2 times in Flexible benefits and 1 other category, where Compt led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market12 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In flexible benefits · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Divvy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts	Compensation and total rewards	2%	12 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Compt at 30%
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	0%	100 of 189	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Divvy yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Divvy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Both Ramp and Divvy offer built-in wallet features that allow you to set up allowances for employees.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Flexible benefits · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Divvy, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Divvy was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CandorIQ1 of 20Not in the top three

Comprehensive1 of 20Not in the top three

Deel1 of 20Not in the top three

Engage1 of 20Not in the top three

Fizz1 of 20Not in the top three

Lattice1 of 20Not in the top three

Nuvio1 of 20Not in the top three

OptionImpact1 of 20Not in the top three

Oracle1 of 20Not in the top three

Orcharstrata1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Divvy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 2 answers that named Divvy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aeqium.com1

candoriq.com1

comprehensive.io1

compup.io1

darwinbox.com1

deel.com1

getstello.ai1

hrsoft.com1

linkedin.com1

morganhr.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Divvy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aeqium.com/post/enterprise-compensation-planning-software-tools1

aeqium.com/resources/compensation-software-selection-guide1

candoriq.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software-hr-teams1

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software1

compup.io/blogs/workforce-planning-tools-compensation-planning1

darwinbox.com/blog/8-best-compensation-management-software-enterprises1

deel.com/blog/10-compensation-management-systems-mid-size-companies1

deel.com/blog/integrated-compensation-payroll-performance-systems1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Divvy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Divvy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at divvy.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.