HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Deel · September 2026 Edition
19 categories · Ranked

Deel

524Judge labels
48First choices
62Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
19Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
29% in Global payroll for small business buyers
Rank 1 of 66 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
6 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 19% of its 53 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In global payroll · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Deel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Global payroll and employer of recordCore HR and payroll22%1 of 6619%53accepted challenger
Contingent workforce managementWorkforce planning and analytics9%3 of 974%25accepted challenger
HRIS and HCM platformsCore HR and payroll5%6 of 460%12accepted challenger
Earned wage accessCompensation and total rewards2%8 of 610%2under 10 labels · led by Tapcheck at 29%
Compensation managementCompensation and total rewards1%20 of 1890%16accepted challenger
HR compliance and policy managementCore HR and payroll0%25 of 845%19accepted challenger
Employee onboardingOnboarding and employee experience0%12 of 10411%18accepted challenger
Payroll softwareCore HR and payroll0%11 of 439%11accepted challenger
Leave and absence managementCore HR and payroll0%21 of 890%9under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 28%
Pay equityCompensation and total rewards0%20 of 600%9under 10 labels · led by Syndio at 17%
Workforce planningWorkforce planning and analytics0%30 of 8929%7under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%
Org charts and org designWorkforce planning and analytics0%21 of 810%5under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 27%
Performance managementPerformance and talent management0%48 of 6033%3under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 41%
People analyticsWorkforce planning and analytics0%44 of 990%2under 10 labels · led by HiBob at 15%
Succession planningPerformance and talent management0%52 of 990%2under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 31%
Compensation benchmarking dataCompensation and total rewards0%102 of 1440%1under 10 labels · led by Payscale at 24%
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accountsCompensation and total rewards0%32 of 760%1under 10 labels · led by Compt at 30%
Time and attendanceCore HR and payroll0%36 of 900%1under 10 labels · led by UKG Ready at 15%
Workforce management suitesCore HR and payroll0%34 of 950%1under 10 labels · led by ADP Workforce Now at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Deel yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Deel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.5244111
GPT-5.4 mini263011
Gemini 3.5 Flash2155325
Perplexity Sonar235212
Grok 4.1 Fast278118
Mistral Small345113
DeepSeek V4 Flash482418
Llama 4 Maverick349016
Qwen 3.7 Flash5113221
Kimi K2394117
GLM 4.7 FlashX2133321
MiniMax M2.5275014

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct77 labels17
Paraphrase83 labels19
Comparative186 labels35not counted in share
Budget-constrained80 labels10
Scale-constrained38 labels2
Negative60 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative524 labels in all, every segment counted; 48 of the 87 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Runs payroll in 130+ countries while supporting wider global workforce use cases across 150+ countries, offering one platform for payroll, EOR, contractors, and workforce operations with strong usability” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Global payroll · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Deel as the default choice if you want the best balance of speed, broad country coverage, and a unified payroll/EOR workflow.” Perplexity Sonar · Global payroll · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Deel is widely considered the gold standard... Start with a trial of Deel if compliance/global payment is your biggest headache.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Deel or Papaya Global. Deel is generally easier to get started with and has strong B2B traction” MiniMax M2.5 · Global payroll · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Drastically Cautioned – Documented Legal/Compliance Issues... Who should avoid: Companies with compliance-sensitive contracts, enterprise clients, or critical payroll deadlines.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Global payroll · negative prompt · hard negative
“While popular, Deel has significant documented issues... Payroll errors and delays are the most frequently cited complaints” Kimi K2 · Global payroll · negative prompt · hard negative
“Deel | Very expensive, not suitable for small teams, limited HR functionality, no mobile app” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Performance management · negative prompt · hard negative
“premium, all-in-one Employer of Record (EOR) providers like Deel, Remote, or Rippling ... their base fees usually range from $499 to $599+ per employee per month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Global payroll · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Deel, over the 518 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Deel was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Rippling296 of 51839Not in the top three
Remote212 of 51815Not in the top three
BambooHR146 of 51822Not in the top three
Gusto145 of 51844Not in the top three
Workday102 of 51817Not in the top three
SAP SuccessFactors69 of 5185Not in the top three
ADP63 of 51814Not in the top three
Multiplier58 of 5181Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Deel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 418 of the 518 answers that named Deel and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com212
gartner.com141
guideflow.com106
g2.com98
forbes.com96
learn.g2.com91
deel.comYour site88
worldmetrics.org87
rippling.com71
hr.software70

972 of the 1,060 domain citations in answers naming Deel came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Deel

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Deel; a claim can dispute any of them.
Deel HR 22Deel Services 5Deel (Compensation Module) 1Deel (Deel HR) 1Deel (featuring Assemble) 1Deel Contractor Management 1Deel Payroll 1Paylocity / Justworks / Deel 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Deel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Deel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at deel.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.