Every category where a model named Empxtrack for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Succession planning	Performance and talent management	8%	3 of 99	0%	10	accepted challenger
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	2%	18 of 189	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Empxtrack yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Empxtrack across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	1	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained14 labels9

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Empxtrack appears to be the most affordable dedicated succession planning solution at around $3/user/month” MiniMax M2.5 · Succession planning · budget prompt · first choice

“Teamflect (free tier) or Empxtrack (~$3/user/month) offer the best value” Kimi K2 · Succession planning · budget prompt · first choice

“Monday.com ($9/seat) or Empxtrack (~$3/seat) are solid choices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Succession planning · budget prompt · first choice

“Aeqium (free basic plan) or Empxtrack (free HR offerings)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compensation management · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Empxtrack, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Empxtrack was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lattice13 of 240Compare →

Paycor12 of 242Not in the top three

SuccessionNow12 of 241Not in the top three

Workday8 of 240Not in the top three

BambooHR7 of 240Not in the top three

SuccessionStack7 of 240Not in the top three

Pave6 of 244Not in the top three

Creately6 of 241Not in the top three

PerformYard6 of 241Not in the top three

Ravio6 of 241Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Empxtrack. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Empxtrack and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app21

gartner.com16

peoplemanagingpeople.com16

softwareadvice.com15

talentguard.com14

g2.com12

monday.com12

guideflow.com11

successionstack.com11

getapp.com9

137 of the 137 domain citations in answers naming Empxtrack came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/performance/succession-planning-software15

talentguard.com/blog/10-best-role-readiness-planning-software-for-202514

monday.com/blog/project-management/succession-planning-software12

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-succession-planning-software12

softwareadvice.com/hr/succession-planning-comparison12

gartner.com/reviews/market/succession-planning-technology10

guideflow.com/blog/succession-planning-software10

successionstack.com/best-succession-planning-software10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Empxtrack's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Empxtrack, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at empxtrack.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.