AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Enrich · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Enrich

30Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Financial wellness for small business buyers
Rank 20 of 117 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In financial wellness · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Enrich for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Financial wellness platformsCompensation and total rewards0%20 of 1170%7under 10 labels · led by LearnLux at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Enrich yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Enrich across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative13 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a primarily digital, education-focused program → LearnLux or Enrich” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial wellness · comparative prompt · alternative
“Want scalable financial education and customization? Look at Enrich” GPT-6 Luna · Financial wellness · comparative prompt · alternative
“Banzai or Enrich: Free/affordable literacy programs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial wellness · negative prompt · alternative
“Enrich emphasizes administrative reporting for HR teams” Kimi K2 · Financial wellness · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Enrich, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enrich was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LearnLux23 of 302Not among the top eight
Origin17 of 303Not among the top eight
Payactiv16 of 300Not among the top eight
Financial Finesse13 of 303Not among the top eight
SmartDollar13 of 302Not among the top eight
Brightside11 of 300Not among the top eight
DailyPay11 of 300Not among the top eight
BrightPlan10 of 303Not among the top eight
Nudge Global10 of 301Not among the top eight
Candidly10 of 300Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Enrich. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named Enrich and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com21
g2.com16
rewordin.com16
us.fitgap.com16
cxeverywhere.com11
compensationtools.net10
selectsoftwarereviews.com10
vantagefit.io10
peoplemanagingpeople.com9
wellable.co9

128 of the 128 domain citations in answers naming Enrich came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

enrich.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Enrich takes 0% of first choices and LearnLux takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “financial wellness platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “financial wellness platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
33,100 a month (“enrich”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
12,220 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 13,683 a month
Searches its site ranks for
616 · 34 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,283
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
30 ads · 18 text, 8 image, 4 video · 9 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2024, as iGrad, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 9 in the year, 21 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 117 in financial wellness
Segment leader
24%
LearnLux
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
30 answers
Its own site cited
in 30 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on enrich.org
790
subdomains included
Content
759
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
7 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog65712026-07-08Financial wellness
News or press7312026-09-08Financial wellness
Case study702024-03-04
Conference or event502024-07-01
Comparison502024-07-08
Template or tool402025-01-16
Podcast or video412026-07-16
Report or ebook202012-11-21
Glossary or explainer202022-07-25
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page enrich.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Enrich

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Enrich; a claim can dispute any of them.
Enrich (iGrad) 1

Follow Enrich

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Enrich is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Providing flexible financial education and strategic partnership to enable organizations to create measurable impact—both for their people and their bottom line.
For
organizations
Customers named
Commonwealth of MassachusettsAllegacy Federal Credit UnionUniversity of PhoenixWhiteland Community High School
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Enrich's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: enrich.org, enrich.org/solutions. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Enrich's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Enrich, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Enrich by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Enrich is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Enrich, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at enrich.org is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.