HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Facebook Jobs · September 2026 Edition
Facebook · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Facebook Jobs

10Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Facebook Jobs was named 2 times in Job advertising, where JobTarget led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Facebook Jobs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Job advertising and distributionTalent acquisition0%98 of 109100%2under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Facebook Jobs yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Facebook Jobs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Scams are commonly carried out through Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, WhatsApp, Telegram, LinkedIn, and similar channels” Perplexity Sonar · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative
“they create Facebook pages or LinkedIn profiles to advertise fake opportunities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Job advertising · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Facebook Jobs, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Facebook Jobs was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Indeed9 of 102Not in the top three
LinkedIn9 of 101Not in the top three
ZipRecruiter8 of 102Not in the top three
Craigslist8 of 100Not in the top three
Monster6 of 100Not in the top three
CareerBuilder4 of 100Not in the top three
Dice3 of 100Not in the top three
Glassdoor3 of 100Not in the top three
Handshake3 of 100Not in the top three
Google for Jobs2 of 100Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Facebook Jobs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Facebook Jobs and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

joinhomebase.com6
pitchmeai.com6
consumer.ftc.gov4
fitsmallbusiness.com4
reddit.com4
uschamber.com4
easyapply.com3
flexjobs.com3
g2.com3
hrmorning.com3

Forty of the forty domain citations in answers naming Facebook Jobs came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Facebook Jobs

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Facebook Jobs; a claim can dispute any of them.
Facebook 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Facebook Jobs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Facebook Jobs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at facebook.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack