HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Intch · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Intch

14Judge labels

0First choices

14Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Intch was named 7 times in Job advertising and 1 other category, where JobTarget led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business91 of 94

under the label threshold

Mid-market109 of 109

under the label threshold

Enterprise70 of 70

under the label threshold

In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Intch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Job advertising and distribution	Talent acquisition	0%	109 of 109	100%	6	under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	0%	116 of 129	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Intch yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Intch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative14 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Promises "5,000+ job matches" ... but delivers recurring charges that are difficult to cancel, fake listings, and immediate spam calls after registration” MiniMax M2.5 · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative

“criticized for being a "subscription trap," with recurring charges that are difficult to cancel, fake listings, and aggressive spam calls” Mistral Small · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative

“Platforms to Avoid Entirely ... Intch — Promises 5,000+ job matches with AI networking, but: Charges you can't cancel easily” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative

“Strongly Avoid (High Scam/ Fraud Risk): Intch.org: Subscription traps with hard-to-cancel recurring charges” Grok 4.1 Fast · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Intch, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Intch was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LinkedIn11 of 144Not in the top three

Indeed11 of 142Not in the top three

Monster8 of 140Not in the top three

ZipRecruiter8 of 140Not in the top three

CareerBuilder7 of 140Not in the top three

Glassdoor7 of 140Not in the top three

Dice6 of 140Not in the top three

Lensa4 of 140Not in the top three

Google for Jobs3 of 141Not in the top three

Bebee3 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Intch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Intch and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

linkedin.com14

reddit.com13

totaldefense.com8

consumer.ftc.gov6

hrmorning.com6

g2.com5

noon.ai5

firsthr.app4

pitchmeai.com4

trustpilot.com4

Sixty-nine of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming Intch came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

linkedin.com/posts/fiona-de-villiers_ethical-give-activistsrevealcorruption-activity-7429414

totaldefense.com/security-blog/job-board-safety-guide-how-to-avoid-employment-scams-on-fak8

hrmorning.com/articles/bad-job-boards6

reddit.com/r/recruitinghell/comments/17a2j56/are_there_any_job_boards_that_arent_mostly_sc6

noon.ai/blog/articles/143-best-job-posting-sites5

consumer.ftc.gov/articles/job-scams4

consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2023/05/scammers-are-hijacking-job-ads-heres-how-spot-fak4

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/job-boards4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Intch

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Intch; a claim can dispute any of them.

Intch (intch.org) 1Intch.org 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Intch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Intch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at intch.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.