Every category where a model named Juicebox for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Recruiting CRM and sourcing	Talent acquisition	0%	20 of 88	0%	24	accepted challenger
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	0%	20 of 84	8%	13	accepted challenger
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	29 of 77	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17%
HR AI assistants	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	59 of 119	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Workativ Assistant at 12%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Juicebox yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Juicebox across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	6	1	0	7
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	3	0	1	5
Mistral Small	0	1	2	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	4	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	3	0	5
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	2	2	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	4	1	0	5
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct18 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative30 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained21 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Gem, Juicebox for recruiting (check pricing fit)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recruiting CRM · negative prompt · first choice

“Best For: Solo recruiters or small startups who want deep, natural-language talent search with transparent, low-cost entry pricing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · budget prompt · alternative

“Choose Juicebox or hireEZ if you want to move away from tedious Boolean keyword strings and utilize AI matching.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruiting CRM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Juicebox.ai: Stands out for AI-first sourcing and outreach, with access to over 800 million global profiles” Mistral Small · Recruiting CRM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“pricier options like Workable ($299/mo) or Juicebox ($99+) for tight budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI recruiting assistants · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Juicebox, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Juicebox was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Manatal42 of 7610Not in the top three

Gem40 of 766Not in the top three

Pin38 of 7613Not in the top three

SeekOut34 of 760Not in the top three

LinkedIn Recruiter33 of 761Not in the top three

hireEZ32 of 761Not in the top three

Fetcher24 of 760Not in the top three

Workable23 of 762Not in the top three

Loxo19 of 764Not in the top three

Zoho Recruit15 of 762Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Juicebox. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 64 of the 76 answers that named Juicebox and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com52

hiretruffle.com38

pin.com38

leonar.app33

juicebox.aiYour site27

metaview.ai22

firsthr.app17

greenhouse.com13

matchr.io12

intervue.io11

236 of the 263 domain citations in answers naming Juicebox came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-candidate-sourcing-tools40

leonar.app/blog/best-talent-sourcing-platforms29

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/sourcing-tools16

pin.com/blog/candidate-sourcing-tools16

hiretruffle.com/blog/ai-recruiting-software15

hiretruffle.com/blog/sourcing-tools-for-recruiters15

pin.com/blog/candidate-sourcing-software14

matchr.io/blog/top-40-best-sourcing-tools12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Juicebox

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Juicebox; a claim can dispute any of them.

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 6Juicebox.ai 2Juicebox / PeopleGPT 1Juicebox.ai (formerly PeopleGPT) 1Juicebox.ai / PeopleGPT 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Juicebox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Juicebox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at juicebox.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.