| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compensation benchmarking data | Compensation and total rewards | 2% | 19 of 144 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Payscale at 24% |
| Contingent workforce management | Workforce planning and analytics | 0% | 84 of 97 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SimpleVMS at 35% |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 119 of 129 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26% |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 77 of 81 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Robert Half is widely considered the gold standard for mid-market companies due to its breadth and accessibility.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compensation benchmarkin · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Common issues include ghosting by recruiters, poor communication, misleading job listings, lack of follow-up, delayed payments/payroll, and legal complaints” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · hard negative
“Robert Half – Numerous complaints from job seekers about misleading job postings, poor communication, and fee practices” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal talent marketpl · negative prompt · hard negative
“Robert Half - Numerous reports of questionable practices from various candidates” Kimi K2 · Recruitment marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“These guides are based strictly on *hiring rates* ... They rarely disclose their methodologies, sample sizes, or geographic breakdowns.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compensation benchmarkin · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 8 answers that named Robert Half and are not a share of its labels.
Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming Robert Half came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Robert Half's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Robert Half, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at roberthalf.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.