HR AI Index
Index Vendors › The Predictive Index · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

The Predictive Index

35Judge labels
4First choices
6Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Candidate assessment for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 101 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 13% of its 15 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named The Predictive Index for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Candidate assessmentTalent acquisition2%6 of 10113%15accepted challenger
Skills intelligencePerformance and talent management0%109 of 1620%1under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for The Predictive Index yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated The Predictive Index across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01113
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00112
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels2
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ideal for mid-market and enterprise companies looking to standardize their hiring process around behavioral fit” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Candidate assessment · direct prompt · first choice
“If behavioral and cognitive insights are a priority, The Predictive Index is an excellent alternative.” Mistral Small · Candidate assessment · direct prompt · alternative
“Best if you want hiring *plus* talent/performance management in one suite” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Candidate assessment · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for: Behavioral Insights and Employee Development” Kimi K2 · Candidate assessment · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise-grade legacy platforms (like SHL, Predictive Index, or Hogan) require expensive annual contracts and formal setup fees.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · soft negative
“Predictive Index, Hogan, SHL are more suited for that, but they’re much more expensive” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as The Predictive Index, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and The Predictive Index was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TestGorilla30 of 3515Not in the top three
Criteria Corp26 of 354Not in the top three
HackerRank17 of 350Not in the top three
Codility15 of 350Not in the top three
Harver15 of 350Not in the top three
SHL13 of 354Not in the top three
Vervoe12 of 351Not in the top three
iMocha12 of 351Not in the top three
HireVue8 of 350Not in the top three
Bryq5 of 351Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named The Predictive Index. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 35 answers that named The Predictive Index and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

jobcannon.io19
pin.com15
testlify.com14
g2.com13
peoplemanagingpeople.com12
adaface.com10
bryq.com10
firsthr.app10
testgorilla.com10
getapp.com9

122 of the 122 domain citations in answers naming The Predictive Index came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as The Predictive Index

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as The Predictive Index; a claim can dispute any of them.
Predictive Index 8The Predictive Index (PI) 2Criteria Corp / Predictive Index 1Predictive Index (PI) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when The Predictive Index's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as The Predictive Index, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thepredictiveindex.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack