Every category where a model named Vervoe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	2%	3 of 101	5%	22	accepted challenger
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	42 of 162	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%
Technical hiring assessments	Talent acquisition	0%	34 of 52	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Vervoe yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Vervoe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	1	1	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Kimi K2	0	4	0	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct14 labels1

Paraphrase9 labelsNone

Comparative18 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained22 labels2

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative6 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Vervoe and Canditech are the most affordable per-candidate options” Mistral Small · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · first choice

“Hiring across all departments (SMB): TestGorilla or Vervoe” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Candidate assessment · comparative prompt · first choice

“Vervoe at $19/month provides the lowest entry point for a full assessment platform” Kimi K2 · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative

“Vervoe is another strong choice if your roles involve practical execution.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Less broad validation for non-tech” Grok 4.1 Fast · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Vervoe, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vervoe was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TestGorilla68 of 7637Compare →

Criteria Corp37 of 761Compare →

HackerRank32 of 762Not in the top three

Codility24 of 762Not in the top three

Toggl Hire22 of 760Not in the top three

EmployTest19 of 761Not in the top three

iMocha19 of 760Not in the top three

Testlify18 of 762Not in the top three

Harver13 of 760Not in the top three

The Predictive Index12 of 761Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vervoe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 76 answers that named Vervoe and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app31

jobcannon.io31

testtrick.com29

testgorilla.com28

fitsmallbusiness.com26

hirevire.com24

peoplemanagingpeople.com24

testlify.com22

bryq.com20

g2.com18

253 of the 253 domain citations in answers naming Vervoe came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

jobcannon.io/compare/best-pre-employment-assessments30

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-pre-employment-assessment-tools26

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/pre-employment-assessment24

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-pre-employment-testing-software20

testtrick.com/blogs/hiring-assessment-tools-small-mid-sized-teams18

bryq.com/blog/best-talent-assessment-platforms-202617

aihr.com/blog/top-pre-employment-assessment-tools15

pin.com/blog/pre-employment-assessment-tools15

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Vervoe

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Vervoe; a claim can dispute any of them.

Vervoe / Harver 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vervoe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vervoe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vervoe.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.