Every category where a model named EmployTest for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	0%	14 of 101	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EmployTest yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EmployTest across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained14 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“EmployTest is a pre-employment assessment tool that offers a skills library and is suitable for SMB budgets.” Llama 4 Maverick · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“may be worth a look if you want pricing that is not tied to annual employee-based contracts” GPT-5.4 mini · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative

“If your hiring volume is very low, EmployTest can be even cheaper on a per-use basis” Perplexity Sonar · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative

“If you hire infrequently, EmployTest's $199 credit pack will last a long time” MiniMax M2.5 · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EmployTest, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EmployTest was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TestGorilla23 of 2416Not in the top three

Vervoe19 of 241Not in the top three

Toggl Hire13 of 241Not in the top three

JobCannon8 of 242Not in the top three

Criteria Corp6 of 240Not in the top three

Hirevire5 of 241Not in the top three

Testlify4 of 241Not in the top three

HackerRank4 of 240Not in the top three

Canditech3 of 240Not in the top three

Equip2 of 240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EmployTest. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 24 answers that named EmployTest and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

jobcannon.io18

firsthr.app16

fitsmallbusiness.com16

anywherer.com15

testgorilla.com15

peoplemanagingpeople.com14

testtrick.com14

hirevire.com13

aihr.com8

getapp.com8

137 of the 137 domain citations in answers naming EmployTest came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

jobcannon.io/compare/best-pre-employment-assessments17

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/pre-employment-assessment16

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-pre-employment-assessment-tools16

anywherer.com/best-pre-employment-assessment-tools15

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-pre-employment-testing-software13

hirevire.com/blog/best-recruitment-assessment-tools10

testtrick.com/blogs/hiring-assessment-tools-small-mid-sized-teams10

aihr.com/blog/top-pre-employment-assessment-tools8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EmployTest's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EmployTest, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at employtest.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.