Every category where a model named Hirevire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Video interviewing	Talent acquisition	10%	2 of 40	0%	13	accepted challenger
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	0%	21 of 101	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	0%	42 of 84	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Hirevire yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Hirevire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase17 labels6

Comparative5 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained28 labels9

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative4 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative64 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Safer Alternatives (high-rated for experience ...): Truffle, Willo, Hirevire, Hireflix—praised for simple links, mobile support” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video interviewing · negative prompt · first choice

“Hirevire combines affordability with powerful features that traditionally were only available in enterprise solutions” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice

“Hirevire is your best bet — it's widely recommended as the best budget option for small businesses.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice

“start with Willo (best free tier and low-cost plans) or Hirevire (lowest monthly cost)” Mistral Small · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hirevire, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hirevire was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Hireflix37 of 6412Not in the top three

Willo27 of 642Not in the top three

EasyHire.me25 of 648Not in the top three

Spark Hire25 of 642Compare →

HireVue22 of 641Not in the top three

myInterview19 of 643Compare →

TestGorilla14 of 649Not in the top three

1Way Interview11 of 642Not in the top three

VidCruiter11 of 640Not in the top three

Truffle10 of 640Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hirevire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 64 answers that named Hirevire and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hirevire.comYour site48

hiretruffle.com40

selectsoftwarereviews.com35

easyhire.me29

willo.video25

g2.com24

firsthr.app20

peoplemanagingpeople.com16

pin.com12

hireflix.com11

212 of the 260 domain citations in answers naming Hirevire came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-video-interview-software29

hiretruffle.com/blog/video-interviewing-solutions26

easyhire.me/video-interview-software/video-interview-software-small-business23

g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-most-affordable-video-interviewing-software-for-smbs16

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/interviewing-platform15

hirevire.com/blog/video-interview-tools-for-small-businesses15

hirevire.com/articles/best-rated-asynchronous-video-interview-platforms11

learn.g2.com/best-video-interviewing-software10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hirevire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hirevire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hirevire.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.