HR AI Index
Index Vendors › 1Way Interview · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

1Way Interview

20Judge labels
5First choices
0Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Video interviewing for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 40 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named 1Way Interview for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Video interviewingTalent acquisition5%7 of 400%6under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 55%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 1Way Interview yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 1Way Interview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels5
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your budget is extremely tight (<$20/month): Go with 1Way Interview at $13.99/month.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need the absolute cheapest: 1WayInterview (~$14/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose 1Way Interview if you have a tiny budget ($14–$20/mo) but need to screen up to 30 candidates a month” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative
“best if your absolute priority is lowest cost and you only need basic prerecorded interviews” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 1Way Interview, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 1Way Interview was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Hireflix20 of 209Not in the top three
EasyHire.me15 of 204Not in the top three
myInterview14 of 202Not in the top three
Spark Hire14 of 200Not in the top three
Willo12 of 200Not in the top three
Hirevire11 of 201Not in the top three
HireVue11 of 200Not in the top three
VidCruiter7 of 200Not in the top three
Truffle4 of 200Not in the top three
BarRaiser2 of 200Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 1Way Interview. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 20 answers that named 1Way Interview and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as 1Way Interview

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as 1Way Interview; a claim can dispute any of them.
1Way Interview (OneWayInterview) 11Way Interview / OneWayInterview 11WayInterview 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 1Way Interview's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 1Way Interview, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 1way.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack