Every category where a model named EasyHire.me for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Video interviewing	Talent acquisition	7%	5 of 40	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 55%
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	2%	15 of 84	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EasyHire.me yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EasyHire.me across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative6 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained21 labels7

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative41 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Zero cost, full workflow | EasyHire.me | Permanent free plan with AI analysis of responses and both async & live interview formats” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI recruiting assistants · budget prompt · first choice

“Choose EasyHire if you want zero ongoing costs and want to test how AI can screen your first few candidates for free.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice

“Zero budget / very light hiring: myInterview (free), EasyHire (free).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice

“Top Pick for Absolute Lowest Cost: EasyHire.me” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“popular one-way interview platforms... frequently associated with the same criticism” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EasyHire.me, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EasyHire.me was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Hireflix34 of 4113Not in the top three

Hirevire25 of 417Not in the top three

Spark Hire24 of 411Not in the top three

myInterview22 of 411Not in the top three

Willo19 of 411Not in the top three

HireVue19 of 410Not in the top three

1Way Interview15 of 415Not in the top three

VidCruiter10 of 410Not in the top three

Pin6 of 413Not in the top three

Truffle5 of 410Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EasyHire.me. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 41 answers that named EasyHire.me and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

easyhire.meYour site37

selectsoftwarereviews.com35

hiretruffle.com28

hirevire.com22

g2.com20

firsthr.app18

willo.video16

noon.ai12

onewayinterview.com11

pin.com11

173 of the 210 domain citations in answers naming EasyHire.me came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-video-interview-software31

easyhire.me/video-interview-software/video-interview-software-small-business29

hiretruffle.com/blog/video-interviewing-solutions25

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/interviewing-platform18

g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-most-affordable-video-interviewing-software-for-smbs15

noon.ai/blog/articles/291-top-10-video-interviewing-software12

easyhire.me/best-video-interview-software11

hiretruffle.com/blog/video-interview-software-pricing11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as EasyHire.me

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EasyHire.me; a claim can dispute any of them.

EasyHire 6easyHire 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EasyHire.me's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EasyHire.me, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at easyhire.me is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.