HR AI Index
Index Vendors › myInterview · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

myInterview

47Judge labels
6First choices
9Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Video interviewing for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 40 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 19% of its 16 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named myInterview for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Video interviewingTalent acquisition10%3 of 4019%16accepted challenger
Interview schedulingTalent acquisition0%56 of 7233%3under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%
AI recruiting assistantsTalent acquisition0%79 of 84100%1under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for myInterview yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated myInterview across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00112
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast10012
Mistral Small11114
DeepSeek V4 Flash01113
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash01012
Kimi K211002
GLM 4.7 FlashX10102
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative15 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels5
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want completely free: Go with myInterview (permanent free tier with real functionality)” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Zero budget / very light hiring: myInterview (free), EasyHire (free).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice
“Spark Hire and myInterview are both highly recommended options” Mistral Small · Video interviewing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: myInterview (Free Forever Tier)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid unsolicited "interview apps" or downloads from LinkedIn/Indeed (e.g., bogus MyInterview or Indeed Interview apps)—these deliver malware.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative
“it processes facial data, raising privacy and bias concerns” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · negative prompt · hard negative
“Medium – Caution on experience | myInterview | Poor mobile experience, technical glitches, perceived as impersonal” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · soft negative
“some of these platforms utilize "sentiment analysis" and basic AI categorization, which are highly controversial” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as myInterview, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and myInterview was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Hireflix34 of 4715Not in the top three
HireVue29 of 471Not in the top three
Willo29 of 471Not in the top three
EasyHire.me22 of 476Not in the top three
VidCruiter18 of 473Not in the top three
1Way Interview14 of 473Not in the top three
Jobma6 of 471Not in the top three
Google Meet5 of 471Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named myInterview. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 47 answers that named myInterview and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com36
hiretruffle.com35
easyhire.me24
hirevire.com24
willo.video22
g2.com18
firsthr.app17
noon.ai17
onewayinterview.com12
learn.g2.com11

216 of the 216 domain citations in answers naming myInterview came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as myInterview

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as myInterview; a claim can dispute any of them.
MyInterview 2
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when myInterview's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as myInterview, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at myinterview.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack