Every category where a model named VidCruiter for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	2%	10 of 101	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%
Video interviewing	Talent acquisition	2%	8 of 40	6%	35	accepted challenger
Interview scheduling	Talent acquisition	0%	14 of 72	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for VidCruiter yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated VidCruiter across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	0	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	2	0	4
Mistral Small	0	1	2	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	4	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	3	1	0	4
Kimi K2	1	3	1	0	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	3	0	5
MiniMax M2.5	2	4	0	0	6

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct23 labels1

Paraphrase16 labels3

Comparative43 labels6not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labels2

Scale-constrained19 labelsNone

Negative20 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative133 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Midsize and large companies needing comprehensive recruitment automation ... Full-featured platform that combines video interviewing with applicant tracking capabilities” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · comparative prompt · first choice

“the most repeated recommendations are VidCruiter, Jobma, and Hireflix for most teams” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · comparative prompt · first choice

“VidCruiter is frequently mentioned as a strong choice for mid-sized businesses” MiniMax M2.5 · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest starting with Spark Hire or VidCruiter” MiniMax M2.5 · Video interviewing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise tools (like *HireVue* or *VidCruiter*) have powerful capabilities but often require dedicated implementation phases.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video interviewing · scale prompt · soft negative

“contracts start near $5,000/year and it's quote-based\u2014better suited to regulated industries” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as VidCruiter, over the 133 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and VidCruiter was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HireVue100 of 13327Not in the top three

Spark Hire93 of 13316Not in the top three

Willo62 of 1332Not in the top three

Hireflix45 of 13313Not in the top three

Jobma31 of 1330Not in the top three

GoodTime28 of 13313Not in the top three

Calendly24 of 1336Not in the top three

Paradox20 of 1330Not in the top three

myInterview18 of 1330Not in the top three

ModernLoop17 of 1330Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named VidCruiter. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 117 of the 133 answers that named VidCruiter and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com83

hiretruffle.com77

willo.video49

hirevire.com45

learn.g2.com43

g2.com37

gartner.com36

resources.rework.com35

peoplemanagingpeople.com32

pin.com32

469 of the 469 domain citations in answers naming VidCruiter came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-video-interview-software69

hiretruffle.com/blog/video-interviewing-solutions56

learn.g2.com/best-video-interviewing-software38

gartner.com/reviews/market/video-interviewing-software36

pin.com/blog/video-interview-platforms31

resources.rework.com/tools/recruiting-ats/best-video-interview-software-202630

noon.ai/blog/articles/291-top-10-video-interviewing-software24

guideflow.com/blog/video-interviewing-software23

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when VidCruiter's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as VidCruiter, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vidcruiter.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.