Every category where a model named Hireflix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Video interviewing	Talent acquisition	5%	6 of 40	6%	35	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Hireflix yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Hireflix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	1	0	5
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	0	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2	0	4
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	2	0	5
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	2	0	3
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels7

Paraphrase17 labels6

Comparative22 labels11not counted in share

Budget-constrained28 labels6

Scale-constrained9 labels3

Negative10 labels6not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative99 labels in all, every segment counted; 22 of the 39 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best video interviewing platform for a company with a limited budget is Hireflix One-Way Video Interviewing, which is known for its simplicity and affordability.” Llama 4 Maverick · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice

“Truffle, Willo, Hirevire, Hireflix—praised for simple links, mobile support, high completion (80%+), and clear consent.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video interviewing · negative prompt · first choice

“the best choice is usually Hireflix if you want the lowest-risk, simple one-way video interviewing setup” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice

“the most repeated recommendations are VidCruiter, Jobma, and Hireflix for most teams” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Too basic; lacks the workflow depth B2B hiring typically needs” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“Hireflix/Willo are solid but very lightweight.” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hireflix, over the 99 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hireflix was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Spark Hire71 of 9911Not in the top three

Willo66 of 994Not in the top three

HireVue56 of 998Not in the top three

VidCruiter45 of 993Not in the top three

Hirevire37 of 999Not in the top three

EasyHire.me34 of 998Not in the top three

myInterview34 of 995Not in the top three

1Way Interview20 of 995Not in the top three

Jobma16 of 990Not in the top three

Truffle12 of 991Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hireflix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 87 of the 99 answers that named Hireflix and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com71

hiretruffle.com67

hirevire.com54

willo.video49

easyhire.me42

g2.com35

hireflix.comYour site29

learn.g2.com29

firsthr.app28

noon.ai28

403 of the 432 domain citations in answers naming Hireflix came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-video-interview-software67

hiretruffle.com/blog/video-interviewing-solutions62

easyhire.me/video-interview-software/video-interview-software-small-business37

learn.g2.com/best-video-interviewing-software29

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/interviewing-platform28

noon.ai/blog/articles/291-top-10-video-interviewing-software28

pin.com/blog/video-interview-platforms25

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/video-interviewing-platforms23

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Hireflix

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Hireflix; a claim can dispute any of them.

Hireflix One-Way Video Interviewing 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hireflix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hireflix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hireflix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.