HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Spark Hire · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Spark Hire

160Judge labels
31First choices
28Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
55% in Video interviewing for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 40 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
12 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 54 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Spark Hire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Video interviewingTalent acquisition55%1 of 4011%54endorsed leader
AI recruiting assistantsTalent acquisition2%17 of 840%2under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%
Interview schedulingTalent acquisition0%51 of 720%1under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Spark Hire yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Spark Hire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.520103
GPT-5.4 mini30104
Gemini 3.5 Flash22015
Perplexity Sonar21014
Grok 4.1 Fast20204
Mistral Small21216
DeepSeek V4 Flash14027
Llama 4 Maverick20406
Qwen 3.7 Flash30003
Kimi K232106
GLM 4.7 FlashX11305
MiniMax M2.521014

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct31 labels14
Paraphrase28 labels11
Comparative40 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained23 labels5
Scale-constrained18 labels1
Negative20 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative160 labels in all, every segment counted; 31 of the 35 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-market B2B companies, Spark Hire is the safest starting point due to its balance of features, price, and ease of use.” Kimi K2 · Video interviewing · direct prompt · first choice
“Spark Hire: The Best All-Rounder ... widely considered the standard for mid-market teams that want a balance of power and simplicity.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video interviewing · direct prompt · first choice
“The Best All-in-One (Async + Live): Spark Hire ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-market talent acquisition” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video interviewing · direct prompt · first choice
“or Spark Hire if you want the clearest, most established option with transparent pricing and a low entry point” GPT-5.4 mini · Video interviewing · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms with Notable Complaints... Spark Hire - Candidate reviews frequently cite... General candidate dissatisfaction described as "dehumanizing"” MiniMax M2.5 · Video interviewing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Any one-way video interview platform (Spark Hire, VideoHire, easyHire, interviewstream) | Candidate backlash, no human dialogue” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · soft negative
“don't need to spend hundreds of dollars per month on enterprise tools like HireVue or Spark Hire” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · budget prompt · soft negative
“solid product, but generally more expensive than the budget-first options above” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Spark Hire, over the 160 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spark Hire was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HireVue122 of 16033Not in the top three
VidCruiter93 of 16011Not in the top three
Willo85 of 1606Not in the top three
Hireflix71 of 16029Not in the top three
Jobma32 of 1604Not in the top three
EasyHire.me24 of 1607Not in the top three
Modern Hire15 of 1600Not in the top three
1Way Interview14 of 1604Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spark Hire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 138 of the 160 answers that named Spark Hire and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hiretruffle.com98
selectsoftwarereviews.com92
willo.video68
hirevire.com64
learn.g2.com53
g2.com45
pin.com44
resources.rework.com44
gartner.com40
noon.ai35

583 of the 583 domain citations in answers naming Spark Hire came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spark Hire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spark Hire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sparkhire.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack