HR AI Index
Index › Vendors › Modern Hire · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Modern Hire

16Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Video interviewing for enterprise buyers
Rank 20 of 40 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business48 of 52
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market20 of 40
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise8 of 50
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
In video interviewing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Modern Hire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Video interviewingTalent acquisition0%20 of 400%2under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 55%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Modern Hire yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Modern Hire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Modern Hire, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Modern Hire was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HireVue15 of 168Not in the top three
Spark Hire15 of 160Not in the top three
VidCruiter12 of 166Not in the top three
Willo7 of 161Not in the top three
Jobma6 of 162Not in the top three
Zoom3 of 160Not in the top three
Hireflix2 of 162Not in the top three
Microsoft Teams2 of 160Not in the top three
Skype2 of 160Not in the top three
Ashby1 of 160Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Modern Hire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 16 answers that named Modern Hire and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com9
gartner.com8
hiretruffle.com7
hirevire.com7
learn.g2.com6
g2.com5
resources.rework.com5
willo.video5
guideflow.com4
hrtechsaas.com4

Sixty of the sixty domain citations in answers naming Modern Hire came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-video-interview-software9
gartner.com/reviews/market/video-interviewing-software8
hiretruffle.com/blog/video-interviewing-solutions7
learn.g2.com/best-video-interviewing-software6
resources.rework.com/tools/recruiting-ats/best-video-interview-software-20265
guideflow.com/blog/video-interviewing-software4
hrtechsaas.com/blog/hirevue-vs-modern-hire-vs-spark-hire4
incruiter.app/blog/best-video-interview-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Modern Hire

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Modern Hire; a claim can dispute any of them.
Montage 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Modern Hire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Modern Hire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at modernhire.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack