Every category where a model named Jobma for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Video interviewing	Talent acquisition	0%	9 of 40	0%	15	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jobma yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jobma across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	2	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labels1

Comparative15 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative4 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the most repeated recommendations are VidCruiter, Jobma, and Hireflix for most teams” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · comparative prompt · first choice

“Mid-market tools (like *Spark Hire*, *Jobma*, or *Willo*) can often be fully integrated, trained, and live within 1 to 2 weeks.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video interviewing · scale prompt · alternative

“if you want AI-powered interviewing, resume screening, and candidate scoring in one place” Perplexity Sonar · Video interviewing · direct prompt · alternative

“best for mid-sized and enterprise teams that want customizable AI-powered video interviewing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Video interviewing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jobma, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jobma was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HireVue32 of 3816Not in the top three

Spark Hire32 of 384Not in the top three

VidCruiter31 of 384Not in the top three

Willo23 of 381Not in the top three

Hireflix16 of 382Not in the top three

Modern Hire6 of 380Not in the top three

Zoom6 of 380Not in the top three

myInterview6 of 380Not in the top three

interviewstream5 of 380Not in the top three

HackerRank4 of 380Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jobma. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 38 answers that named Jobma and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com26

hiretruffle.com25

jobma.comYour site17

willo.video17

hirevire.com16

peoplemanagingpeople.com16

learn.g2.com15

guideflow.com14

gartner.com13

g2.com10

152 of the 169 domain citations in answers naming Jobma came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-video-interview-software26

hiretruffle.com/blog/video-interviewing-solutions25

learn.g2.com/best-video-interviewing-software15

guideflow.com/blog/video-interviewing-software14

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/video-interviewing-platforms14

gartner.com/reviews/market/video-interviewing-software13

noon.ai/blog/articles/291-top-10-video-interviewing-software9

pin.com/blog/video-interview-platforms9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jobma's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jobma, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jobma.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.