Every category where a model named interviewstream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Video interviewing	Talent acquisition	0%	10 of 40	8%	13	accepted challenger
Technical hiring assessments	Talent acquisition	0%	49 of 52	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for interviewstream yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated interviewstream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other notable options include interviewstream, which offers end-to-end solutions with scheduling and AI tools” Mistral Small · Video interviewing · direct prompt · alternative

“All-in-one system with scheduling + video interviews + AI tools, scalable for mid-market needs” MiniMax M2.5 · Video interviewing · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for: Mid-sized companies wanting all-in-one solution” MiniMax M2.5 · Video interviewing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Strong Alternative: interviewstream” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“popular one-way interview platforms... frequently associated with the same criticism” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video interviewing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as interviewstream, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and interviewstream was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Spark Hire14 of 167Not in the top three

HireVue11 of 162Not in the top three

VidCruiter11 of 161Not in the top three

Hireflix5 of 160Not in the top three

Jobma5 of 160Not in the top three

Willo4 of 160Not in the top three

myInterview3 of 160Not in the top three

BarRaiser2 of 160Not in the top three

Google Meet2 of 160Not in the top three

Hirevire2 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named interviewstream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named interviewstream and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

interviewstream.comYour site10

hiretruffle.com8

hirevire.com8

noon.ai8

selectsoftwarereviews.com8

resources.rework.com5

sparkhire.com5

gartner.com4

incruiter.app4

willo.video4

Fifty-four of the sixty-four domain citations in answers naming interviewstream came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

interviewstream.com/resources/blog/the-best-video-interview-software10

hiretruffle.com/blog/video-interviewing-solutions8

noon.ai/blog/articles/291-top-10-video-interviewing-software8

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-video-interview-software8

gartner.com/reviews/market/video-interviewing-software4

hirevire.com/blog/best-video-interviewing-platform4

resources.rework.com/tools/recruiting-ats/best-video-interview-software-20264

herohunt.ai/blog/best-virtual-meeting-platforms3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as interviewstream

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as interviewstream; a claim can dispute any of them.

InterviewStream 6Interviewstream 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when interviewstream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as interviewstream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at interviewstream.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.