Every category where a model named Truffle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	0%	22 of 84	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%
Video interviewing	Talent acquisition	0%	11 of 40	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 55%
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	0%	31 of 101	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Truffle yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Truffle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	1	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labels2

Comparative15 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative4 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Safer Alternatives (high-rated for experience, per G2/Capterra/Reddit): Truffle, Willo, Hirevire, Hireflix” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video interviewing · negative prompt · first choice

“Choose Truffle if you have highly technical or specific hiring managers who need to see clear evidence and reasoning” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“One-way video interviews with highlight reels and transparent match scoring; more SMB-friendly than HireVue.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Small businesses wanting to combine video interviews and basic assessments.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Truffle, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Truffle was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HireVue16 of 461Not in the top three

Manatal15 of 467Not in the top three

Hireflix12 of 465Not in the top three

Spark Hire10 of 462Not in the top three

Hirevire10 of 461Not in the top three

Workable10 of 460Not in the top three

Zoho Recruit10 of 460Not in the top three

TestGorilla9 of 464Not in the top three

Breezy HR9 of 461Not in the top three

Willo9 of 460Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Truffle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 46 answers that named Truffle and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hiretruffle.com33

selectsoftwarereviews.com20

hirevire.com13

pin.com12

g2.com11

peoplemanagingpeople.com10

willo.video10

resources.rework.com9

greenhouse.com7

learn.g2.com7

132 of the 132 domain citations in answers naming Truffle came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hiretruffle.com/blog/video-interviewing-solutions11

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-video-interview-software9

hiretruffle.com/blog/ai-recruiting-software8

resources.rework.com/tools/recruiting-ats/best-video-interview-software-20267

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/ai-recruiting7

greenhouse.com/blog/best-ai-recruiting-software6

lindy.ai/blog/best-ai-recruiting-tools-20246

pin.com/blog/best-ai-recruiting-tools-small-teams6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Truffle

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Truffle; a claim can dispute any of them.

Truffle (Hire Truffle) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Truffle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Truffle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at truffle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.