| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interview scheduling | Talent acquisition | 21% | 1 of 72 | 40% | 52 | criticized challenger |
| Workforce scheduling | Core HR and payroll | 0% | 14 of 94 | 25% | 20 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Calendly – Offers a free plan that includes basic scheduling, calendar sync, and reminders. It's user-friendly and widely used” Mistral Small · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“Calendly is the most popular name in the category... Choose Calendly if you have a small team, diverse needs (sales + hiring)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Interview scheduling · comparative prompt · first choice
“Calendly ⭐ Most Popular ... Choose Calendly if you want the easiest, most recognized solution for team scheduling” Kimi K2 · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · first choice
“Calendly Enterprise: The gold standard for basic functionality. Highly customizable, but can be expensive per-seat.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Interview scheduling · scale prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“it's frequently cited as a tool recruiting teams outgrow quickly: Built for two-party scheduling, not complex panel interviews” Kimi K2 · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative
“basic scheduling links (like standard Calendly) or relying entirely on manual emails will severely bottleneck your growth... Breaks down completely once you try to schedule 3-person panel loops” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · scale prompt · soft negative
“Why to be cautious: These platforms are fantastic for lightweight, 1-on-1 recruiter phone screens. However, they quickly fall apart if you try to use them for multi-stage or panel interviews.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
“users frequently criticize Calendly’s billing model, which continues to charge for inactive user "seats", and its decision to lock security features ... behind expensive Enterprise tiers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 179 of the 218 answers that named Calendly and are not a share of its labels.
595 of the 649 domain citations in answers naming Calendly came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Calendly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Calendly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at calendly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.