HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Calendly · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Calendly

219Judge labels
40First choices
80Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
62% in Interview scheduling for small business buyers
Rank 1 of 72 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 40% of its 52 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
In interview scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Calendly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Interview schedulingTalent acquisition21%1 of 7240%52criticized challenger
Workforce schedulingCore HR and payroll0%14 of 9425%20criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Calendly yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Calendly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511215
GPT-5.4 mini31004
Gemini 3.5 Flash02068
Perplexity Sonar21014
Grok 4.1 Fast31037
Mistral Small21025
DeepSeek V4 Flash12047
Llama 4 Maverick11215
Qwen 3.7 Flash52007
Kimi K221047
GLM 4.7 FlashX12137
MiniMax M2.521216

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct35 labels11
Paraphrase9 labels5
Comparative64 labels27not counted in share
Budget-constrained35 labels18
Scale-constrained18 labels6
Negative58 labels7not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative219 labels in all, every segment counted; 40 of the 74 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Calendly – Offers a free plan that includes basic scheduling, calendar sync, and reminders. It's user-friendly and widely used” Mistral Small · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · first choice
“Calendly is the most popular name in the category... Choose Calendly if you have a small team, diverse needs (sales + hiring)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Interview scheduling · comparative prompt · first choice
“Calendly ⭐ Most Popular ... Choose Calendly if you want the easiest, most recognized solution for team scheduling” Kimi K2 · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · first choice
“Calendly Enterprise: The gold standard for basic functionality. Highly customizable, but can be expensive per-seat.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Interview scheduling · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it's frequently cited as a tool recruiting teams outgrow quickly: Built for two-party scheduling, not complex panel interviews” Kimi K2 · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative
“basic scheduling links (like standard Calendly) or relying entirely on manual emails will severely bottleneck your growth... Breaks down completely once you try to schedule 3-person panel loops” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · scale prompt · soft negative
“Why to be cautious: These platforms are fantastic for lightweight, 1-on-1 recruiter phone screens. However, they quickly fall apart if you try to use them for multi-stage or panel interviews.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
“users frequently criticize Calendly’s billing model, which continues to charge for inactive user "seats", and its decision to lock security features ... behind expensive Enterprise tiers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Calendly, over the 218 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Calendly was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
GoodTime105 of 21837Not in the top three
YouCanBookMe63 of 2181Not in the top three
Lever50 of 2185Not in the top three
candidate.fyi46 of 21817Not in the top three
Paradox42 of 2180Not in the top three
Cal.com39 of 2184Not in the top three
Doodle39 of 2180Not in the top three
Acuity Scheduling38 of 2180Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Calendly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 179 of the 218 answers that named Calendly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

lever.co90
candidate.fyi87
hiretruffle.com75
cal.com74
selectsoftwarereviews.com65
youcanbook.me58
calendly.comYour site54
goodtime.io52
metaview.ai47
peoplemanagingpeople.com47

595 of the 649 domain citations in answers naming Calendly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Calendly

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Calendly; a claim can dispute any of them.
Calendly (Teams/Enterprise) 1Calendly Enterprise 1Calendly Free 1Calendly Sales / Calendly Recruiting 1Calendly for Teams 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Calendly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Calendly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at calendly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack