Every category where a model named Acuity Scheduling for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	0%	16 of 94	10%	10	accepted challenger
Interview scheduling	Talent acquisition	0%	72 of 72	50%	6	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	42 of 116	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Acuity Scheduling yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Acuity Scheduling across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	2	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	1	3
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative23 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative16 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Ideal for service businesses, offering features like payments, intake forms, packages, and multi-location support” Mistral Small · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Acuity if you sell coaching packages, need deposits, or require medical forms.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Acuity if you run a service business and need payments, forms, and packages” Kimi K2 · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Service-based businesses (coaches, salons, therapists, fitness trainers).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“users report significant operational friction: Poor Squarespace integration... No bulk cancellation capability” Kimi K2 · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid pure generalists (e.g., Acuity) for recruiting; they lack panel/ATS depth.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Interview scheduling · direct prompt · hard negative

“its interface is widely considered too complex, cluttered, and difficult to set up compared to cleaner, modern alternatives” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Workforce scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

“Basic or free tiers of Calendly, Acuity, or YouCanBook.me... they quickly fall apart” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interview scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Acuity Scheduling, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acuity Scheduling was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly38 of 4212Not in the top three

Cal.com17 of 420Not in the top three

Doodle15 of 420Not in the top three

Setmore12 of 420Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe12 of 420Not in the top three

Square Appointments10 of 422Not in the top three

GoodTime9 of 422Not in the top three

Google Calendar9 of 420Not in the top three

Shiftboard6 of 422Not in the top three

Lever6 of 421Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Acuity Scheduling. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 42 answers that named Acuity Scheduling and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cal.com21

capterra.com18

calendly.com15

learn.g2.com12

youcanbook.me12

gitnux.org11

candidate.fyi9

g2.com9

koalendar.com9

lunacal.ai9

125 of the 125 domain citations in answers naming Acuity Scheduling came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

capterra.com/resources/best-scheduling-software-reviews-analysis9

hiretruffle.com/blog/interview-scheduling-tools8

lever.co/insights/best-interview-scheduling-software8

cal.com/blog/best-interview-scheduling-software7

cal.com/blog/enterprise-scheduling-software7

candidate.fyi/interview-scheduling-software7

gitnux.org/best/enterprise-scheduling-software6

leadangel.com/blog/operations/enterprise-scheduling-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Acuity Scheduling

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Acuity Scheduling; a claim can dispute any of them.

Acuity 3Acuity Scheduling (Squarespace) 1Acuity Scheduling (by Squarespace) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Acuity Scheduling's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Acuity Scheduling, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at acuityscheduling.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.