Every category where a model named Setmore for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Interview scheduling	Talent acquisition	0%	15 of 72	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 21%
Workforce scheduling	Core HR and payroll	0%	27 of 94	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Deputy at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Setmore yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Setmore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained14 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need team collaboration and mobile access, Setmore is a strong choice.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · alternative

“Offers a free plan with unlimited interviews, calendar sync, and reminders.” Mistral Small · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · alternative

“ideal for small teams and online classes with generous free limits” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

“Offers one of the most robust free plans available” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Workforce scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Setmore has complaints about Google Calendar sync reliability, requires a paid plan for SMS reminders” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Workforce scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Setmore, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Setmore was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly32 of 3420Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe20 of 342Not in the top three

Acuity Scheduling12 of 340Not in the top three

Koalendar11 of 347Not in the top three

Cal.com8 of 341Not in the top three

GoodTime7 of 341Not in the top three

Square Appointments7 of 341Not in the top three

Microsoft Bookings6 of 340Not in the top three

Doodle5 of 340Not in the top three

Google Calendar5 of 340Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Setmore. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 34 answers that named Setmore and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

youcanbook.me16

selectsoftwarereviews.com15

cal.com14

lever.co13

capterra.com12

koalendar.com12

calendly.com11

hiretruffle.com11

peoplemanagingpeople.com11

fluentbooking.com10

125 of the 125 domain citations in answers naming Setmore came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/interview-scheduling-software15

lever.co/insights/best-interview-scheduling-software13

hiretruffle.com/blog/interview-scheduling-tools11

fluentbooking.com/articles/best-interview-scheduling-software10

youcanbook.me/blog/free-interview-schedulers10

firsthr.app/compare/time-tracking/interview-scheduling-software9

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-interview-scheduling-software9

bizbot.com/blog/top-10-interview-scheduling-tools-20247

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Setmore's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Setmore, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at setmore.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.