Every category where a model named Koalendar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Interview scheduling	Talent acquisition	11%	4 of 72	0%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Koalendar yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Koalendar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative11 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained16 labels10

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best interview scheduling software for a company with a limited budget is Koalendar, which offers a genuinely free-forever plan and is simple to use.” Llama 4 Maverick · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · first choice

“the best interview scheduling software is usually Calendly or Koalendar if you want a dedicated scheduler” Perplexity Sonar · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · first choice

“I would recommend starting with Koalendar or Calendly since they offer the most robust free plans” MiniMax M2.5 · Interview scheduling · budget prompt · first choice

“Calendly or Koalendar (Koalendar has a generous free plan and strong automation)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Interview scheduling · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Koalendar, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Koalendar was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Calendly36 of 3815Not in the top three

YouCanBookMe29 of 381Not in the top three

GoodTime19 of 381Not in the top three

Setmore11 of 380Not in the top three

Lever10 of 383Not in the top three

Google Calendar9 of 380Not in the top three

ModernLoop9 of 380Not in the top three

Picktime7 of 380Not in the top three

Microsoft Bookings6 of 380Not in the top three

Breezy HR5 of 381Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Koalendar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 38 answers that named Koalendar and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

lever.co30

koalendar.comYour site25

youcanbook.me23

hiretruffle.com21

selectsoftwarereviews.com20

candidate.fyi15

fluentbooking.com15

cal.com13

peoplemanagingpeople.com11

recruiterflow.com11

159 of the 184 domain citations in answers naming Koalendar came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

lever.co/insights/best-interview-scheduling-software30

youcanbook.me/blog/free-interview-schedulers22

hiretruffle.com/blog/interview-scheduling-tools21

koalendar.com/blog/best-interview-scheduling-software19

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/interview-scheduling-software19

candidate.fyi/interview-scheduling-software15

fluentbooking.com/articles/best-interview-scheduling-software15

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-interview-scheduling-software11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Koalendar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Koalendar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at koalendar.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.