HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Toggl Hire · September 2026 Edition
Toggl · 1 category · Ranked

Toggl Hire

35Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Candidate assessment for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 101 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Toggl Hire for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Candidate assessmentTalent acquisition2%8 of 1010%5under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Toggl Hire yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Toggl Hire across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labels2
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Toggl Hire if you want the absolute best free tier for general, fast-paced skills testing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · first choice
“Best if you want simple free screening with strict limits: Toggl Hire offers a free plan with 5 candidates per job” Perplexity Sonar · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative
“Available for $199 per month, it provides a good balance of affordability and features” Mistral Small · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative
“Best free plan option mentioned in reviews.” MiniMax M2.5 · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Toggl Hire, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Toggl Hire was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TestGorilla34 of 3527Not in the top three
Vervoe22 of 351Not in the top three
EmployTest13 of 351Not in the top three
Testlify10 of 350Not in the top three
Criteria Corp9 of 350Not in the top three
JobCannon7 of 350Not in the top three
HackerRank6 of 350Not in the top three
Hirevire4 of 351Not in the top three
TestDome4 of 351Not in the top three
CodeSignal3 of 351Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Toggl Hire. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 35 answers that named Toggl Hire and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fitsmallbusiness.com22
hirevire.com17
jobcannon.io17
peoplemanagingpeople.com16
firsthr.app14
anywherer.com13
testgorilla.com13
testtrick.com13
getapp.com11
hiretruffle.com11

147 of the 147 domain citations in answers naming Toggl Hire came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Toggl Hire's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Toggl Hire, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at toggl.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack