Every category where a model named TestDome for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Technical hiring assessments	Talent acquisition	8%	5 of 52	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 28%
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	0%	25 of 101	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TestDome yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TestDome across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels1

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative6 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained13 labels7

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative7 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative39 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tools like TestDome, Codility (for coders), or TestGorilla (with caution) are generally well-regarded” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Candidate assessment · negative prompt · first choice

“TestDome if you hire infrequently (just pay per candidate)” MiniMax M2.5 · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · first choice

“Pay only for what you use; no recurring subscription fee.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · first choice

“Top Pick: TestDome” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TestDome, over the 39 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TestDome was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HackerRank28 of 395Not in the top three

Codility23 of 390Not in the top three

TestGorilla20 of 397Not in the top three

Coderbyte20 of 395Not in the top three

CodeSignal19 of 392Not in the top three

CoderPad16 of 392Not in the top three

HireVue5 of 390Not in the top three

Vervoe5 of 390Not in the top three

Testlify4 of 391Not in the top three

Toggl Hire4 of 391Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TestDome. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 39 answers that named TestDome and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hackerrank.com17

codesubmit.io16

selectsoftwarereviews.com14

interviewcost.com13

testgorilla.com12

testtrick.com12

codesignal.com9

goodfit.so9

testdome.comYour site9

testlify.com9

111 of the 120 domain citations in answers naming TestDome came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/online-coding-interview-tools14

codesubmit.io/blog/coding-assessment-tools-202413

interviewcost.com/coding-assessment-cost12

hackerrank.com/writing/best-coding-assessment-tools10

goodfit.so/guides/best-coding-assessment-platforms9

testgorilla.com/blog/coding-assessment-tools9

codesignal.com/blog/5-coding-assessment-platforms-for-your-technical-hiring6

codesubmit.io/blog/coding-assessment-tools6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TestDome's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TestDome, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at testdome.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.