Every category where a model named CoderPad for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Technical hiring assessments	Talent acquisition	21%	2 of 52	0%	40	accepted challenger
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	0%	26 of 101	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	79 of 162	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%
Video interviewing	Talent acquisition	0%	24 of 40	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Spark Hire at 55%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CoderPad yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CoderPad across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	4	1	5
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	2	2	7
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	2	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	1	4
Mistral Small	1	2	1	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	4	1	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	1	3
Kimi K2	3	1	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels3

Paraphrase29 labels14

Comparative33 labels7not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels3

Scale-constrained17 labels3

Negative20 labels6not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative129 labels in all, every segment counted; 23 of the 36 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Prioritize platforms that offer work-sample style assessments over pure algorithm tests (e.g., CoderPad, HackerRank Projects, Codility's newer formats)” MiniMax M2.5 · Technical hiring assessm · scale prompt · first choice

“1. CoderPad (Best for Real-World, AI-Native Collaborative Hiring) CoderPad is highly regarded for simulating what a developer actually does on the job.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · comparative prompt · first choice

“For ultra-tight budgets: Start with CoderPad's free plan ... CoderPad Starter ($80/month annual) - unlimited users” Kimi K2 · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · first choice

“The best platforms (like CoderPad for live interviews, or take-home tasks) respect your time and privacy” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CoderPad, over the 129 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoderPad was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HackerRank112 of 12929Compare →

CodeSignal88 of 12910Not in the top three

Codility87 of 1296Not in the top three

TestGorilla53 of 1298Not in the top three

Coderbyte20 of 1297Compare →

TestDome16 of 1292Not in the top three

Mercer | Mettl15 of 1290Not in the top three

DevSkiller13 of 1290Not in the top three

Criteria Corp12 of 1292Not in the top three

CodeSubmit12 of 1291Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoderPad. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 102 of the 129 answers that named CoderPad and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hackerrank.com73

codility.com56

coderpad.ioYour site50

codesignal.com47

utkrusht.ai38

codesubmit.io37

selectsoftwarereviews.com36

testlify.com32

testtrick.com31

testgorilla.com29

379 of the 429 domain citations in answers naming CoderPad came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

codility.com/how-to-choose-technical-assessment-platform50

hackerrank.com/writing/best-coding-assessment-tools47

augmentcode.com/tools/best-coding-assessment-tools-enterprise28

codesignal.com/blog/5-coding-assessment-platforms-for-your-technical-hiring28

codesubmit.io/blog/coding-assessment-tools-202428

goodfit.so/guides/best-coding-assessment-platforms26

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/online-coding-interview-tools26

hackerrank.com/writing/best-developer-assessment-platforms-for-startups-hiring-remotely-oc23

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CoderPad

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CoderPad; a claim can dispute any of them.

Coderpad 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoderPad's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoderPad, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coderpad.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.