HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › CodeSubmit · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

CodeSubmit

15Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CodeSubmit was named 4 times in Technical hiring assessm, where HackerRank led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business7 of 61

under the label threshold

Mid-market16 of 52

under the label threshold

Enterprise16 of 38

under the label threshold

In technical hiring assessm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CodeSubmit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Technical hiring assessments	Talent acquisition	0%	16 of 52	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CodeSubmit yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CodeSubmit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want to spend less than $50, CodeSubmit Solo is the only real option” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · alternative

“Practical take-home coding challenges with strong security: CodeSubmit.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Technical hiring assessm · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for Real-World Take-Homes: CodeSubmit” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CodeSubmit, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CodeSubmit was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HackerRank13 of 153Not in the top three

CoderPad12 of 155Not in the top three

CodeSignal11 of 153Not in the top three

Codility7 of 152Not in the top three

TestGorilla7 of 150Not in the top three

Coderbyte4 of 151Not in the top three

DevSkiller3 of 150Not in the top three

Woven3 of 150Not in the top three

TestDome2 of 152Not in the top three

Adaface2 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CodeSubmit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 15 answers that named CodeSubmit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

codesubmit.ioYour site8

hackerrank.com6

codesignal.com5

codility.com5

selectsoftwarereviews.com5

testgorilla.com4

augmentcode.com3

coderpad.io3

testlify.com3

wifitalents.com3

Thirty-seven of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming CodeSubmit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

codesubmit.io/blog/coding-assessment-tools-20246

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/online-coding-interview-tools5

testgorilla.com/blog/coding-assessment-tools4

augmentcode.com/tools/best-coding-assessment-tools-enterprise3

coderpad.io/3

codesignal.com/blog/5-coding-assessment-platforms-for-your-technical-hiring3

codesubmit.io/blog/coding-assessment-tools3

codility.com/how-to-choose-technical-assessment-platform3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CodeSubmit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CodeSubmit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at codesubmit.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.