HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Adaface · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Adaface

16Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Adaface was named 9 times in Candidate assessment and 2 other categories, where TestGorilla led with 68%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market17 of 101

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Adaface for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	0%	17 of 101	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%
Technical hiring assessments	Talent acquisition	0%	18 of 52	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 28%
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	0%	38 of 84	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Adaface yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Adaface across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	1	3
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Another strong option, especially for companies that want a balance of technical and soft skills testing.” Mistral Small · Candidate assessment · direct prompt · alternative

“The Best for Technical & Specialized Roles: Adaface or TestGorilla” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“High Volume & Speed | Adaface | Conversational AI screening” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Credit-based annual plans starting at $180/year for 12 credits” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adaface, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adaface was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TestGorilla14 of 165Not in the top three

HackerRank11 of 161Not in the top three

Codility9 of 161Not in the top three

CodeSignal7 of 161Not in the top three

CoderPad7 of 161Not in the top three

Criteria Corp6 of 161Not in the top three

Coderbyte5 of 164Not in the top three

DevSkiller5 of 160Not in the top three

TestDome4 of 162Not in the top three

Vervoe3 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adaface. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 16 answers that named Adaface and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adaface.comYour site7

testtrick.com7

testlify.com6

hackerrank.com5

g2.com4

augmentcode.com3

bryq.com3

codesignal.com3

codility.com3

intervue.io3

Thirty-seven of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming Adaface came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

augmentcode.com/tools/best-coding-assessment-tools-enterprise3

testtrick.com/blogs/best-technical-assessment-tools3

testtrick.com/blogs/hiring-assessment-tools-small-mid-sized-teams3

adaface.com/blog/pre-employment-assessment-tools2

adaface.com/tech-recruiting-tools2

bryq.com/blog/best-talent-assessment-platforms-20262

codeassess.dev/blogs/technical-assessment-tools-comparison2

codesubmit.io/blog/coding-assessment-tools-20242

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adaface's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adaface, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adaface.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.