HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Woven · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Woven

11Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Woven was named 8 times in Technical hiring assessm, where HackerRank led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business23 of 61

under the label threshold

Mid-market12 of 52

under the label threshold

Enterprise24 of 38

under the label threshold

In technical hiring assessm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Woven for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Technical hiring assessments	Talent acquisition	0%	12 of 52	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Woven yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Woven across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Platforms often cited as more reliable or realistic alternatives include: - Woven (for experienced hiring)” Mistral Small · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · first choice

“Byteboard or Woven: These evaluate candidates on real engineering tasks” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · negative prompt · first choice

“Human-powered, scenario-based assessments for experienced engineers: Woven.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Technical hiring assessm · comparative prompt · alternative

“Woven (Best for "Human-in-the-Loop" Mid-to-Senior Hiring)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Technical hiring assessm · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Woven, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Woven was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Codility10 of 112Not in the top three

HackerRank10 of 111Not in the top three

CoderPad8 of 114Not in the top three

CodeSignal8 of 111Not in the top three

TestGorilla7 of 111Not in the top three

Karat7 of 110Not in the top three

DevSkiller4 of 110Not in the top three

CodeSubmit3 of 110Not in the top three

HackerEarth2 of 110Not in the top three

Mercer | Mettl2 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Woven. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 11 answers that named Woven and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

woventeams.comYour site5

codility.com4

gitnux.org4

codesignal.com3

codesubmit.io3

devskiller.com3

wifitalents.com3

g2.com2

hackerrank.com2

resources.rework.com2

Twenty-six of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Woven came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

woventeams.com/post/the-most-effective-technical-assessment-for-job-interviews5

codility.com/how-to-choose-technical-assessment-platform4

gitnux.org/best/technical-assessment-software4

codesubmit.io/blog/coding-assessment-tools-20243

devskiller.com/it/blog/technical-assessment-platforms3

wifitalents.com/best/technical-assessment-software3

hackerrank.com/writing/best-coding-assessment-tools2

resources.rework.com/tools/recruiting-ats/best-hackerrank-alternatives2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Woven's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Woven, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at woventeams.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.