Every category where a model named Testlify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	2%	4 of 101	0%	13	accepted challenger
Technical hiring assessments	Talent acquisition	0%	47 of 52	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HackerRank at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Testlify yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Testlify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase13 labels3

Comparative17 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the recommended skills testing tool for hiring for a mid-sized B2B company is Testlify” Llama 4 Maverick · Candidate assessment · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Reputable alternatives like those with strong validation (e.g., some mention Testlify positively) prioritize usability and fairness.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Candidate assessment · negative prompt · alternative

“Choose Mercer Mettl/Testlify if: You are a large enterprise needing robust compliance, massive scale” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Candidate assessment · comparative prompt · alternative

“Testlify, offering affordable plans starting at $19/month with 1400+ multilingual assessments” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Testlify, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Testlify was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TestGorilla42 of 4819Not in the top three

HackerRank22 of 481Not in the top three

Vervoe18 of 481Not in the top three

Codility18 of 480Not in the top three

Criteria Corp18 of 480Not in the top three

iMocha15 of 484Not in the top three

Mercer | Mettl10 of 482Not in the top three

Toggl Hire10 of 480Not in the top three

SHL8 of 483Not in the top three

Harver8 of 480Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Testlify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 48 answers that named Testlify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

testlify.comYour site36

bryq.com21

testtrick.com21

testgorilla.com20

g2.com15

hirevire.com11

learn.g2.com11

firsthr.app10

fitsmallbusiness.com10

gartner.com10

129 of the 165 domain citations in answers naming Testlify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bryq.com/blog/best-talent-assessment-platforms-202619

testlify.com/guide-to-choose-the-best-talent-assessment-software17

testtrick.com/blogs/hiring-assessment-tools-small-mid-sized-teams13

learn.g2.com/best-talent-assessment-tools11

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-pre-employment-assessment-tools10

gartner.com/reviews/market/talent-assessment-software10

greenhouse.com/blog/best-recruiting-assessment-tools10

jobcannon.io/compare/best-pre-employment-assessments10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Testlify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Testlify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at testlify.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.