HR AI Index
Index Vendors › JobCannon · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

JobCannon

20Judge labels
5First choices
2Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. JobCannon was named 5 times in Candidate assessment, where TestGorilla led with 68%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named JobCannon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Candidate assessmentTalent acquisition2%7 of 1010%5under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for JobCannon yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated JobCannon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained16 labels5
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best pre-employment assessment platform for a company with a limited budget is JobCannon” Llama 4 Maverick · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose JobCannon if your priority is personality, behavioral fit, and culture matching at an extremely low price.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative
“JobCannon"s Scale plan is about $1,990 per year (flat rate), which is very budget-friendly” Mistral Small · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative
“JobCannon (flat rate) becomes cheapest per candidate” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as JobCannon, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JobCannon was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TestGorilla13 of 208Not in the top three
Vervoe9 of 202Not in the top three
Criteria Corp9 of 201Not in the top three
EmployTest8 of 201Not in the top three
Toggl Hire7 of 202Not in the top three
SHL6 of 200Not in the top three
HackerRank5 of 200Not in the top three
Harver5 of 200Not in the top three
The Predictive Index5 of 200Not in the top three
Bryq4 of 202Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JobCannon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 20 answers that named JobCannon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

jobcannon.ioYour site18
firsthr.app12
pin.com10
testgorilla.com10
fitsmallbusiness.com9
testtrick.com9
hirevire.com8
peoplemanagingpeople.com7
aihr.com6
anywherer.com6

Seventy-seven of the ninety-five domain citations in answers naming JobCannon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as JobCannon

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as JobCannon; a claim can dispute any of them.
JobCannon (Scale plan) 1JobCannon Scale 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JobCannon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JobCannon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jobcannon.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack