Every category where a model named Workativ Assistant for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
HR AI assistants	Onboarding and employee experience	12%	1 of 119	0%	18	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workativ Assistant yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workativ Assistant across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels5

Paraphrase20 labels5

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained11 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative53 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Workativ if your main goal is employee HR support and internal workflow automation” Perplexity Sonar · HR AI assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Workativ Assistant and Capacity are the most highly rated and scalable options” Mistral Small · HR AI assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Leena AI or Workativ are the most recommended for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · HR AI assistants · direct prompt · first choice

“I recommend Workativ Assistant for a mid-sized B2B company” GLM 4.7 FlashX · HR AI assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workativ Assistant, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workativ Assistant was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Leena AI26 of 536Compare →

Moveworks21 of 532Not in the top three

MeBeBot20 of 5314Not in the top three

BambooHR18 of 531Not in the top three

Rippling15 of 530Not in the top three

Gusto14 of 537Not in the top three

Paradox11 of 530Not in the top three

Lattice8 of 531Not in the top three

ChatGPT7 of 531Compare →

Humand6 of 531Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workativ Assistant. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 53 answers that named Workativ Assistant and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

workativ.comYour site44

moveworks.com23

hrtechsaas.com21

simular.ai17

herothemes.com16

chatbot.com15

humand.co15

resources.rework.com15

wotnot.io15

firsthr.app14

151 of the 195 domain citations in answers naming Workativ Assistant came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

workativ.com/hr/blog/hr-chatbots-for-smbs22

workativ.com/ai-agent/blog/hr-chatbots-for-smbs21

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-ai-hr-chatbot18

simular.ai/alternatives/top-9-best-hr-chatbots-for-teams-tested-reviewed17

herothemes.com/blog/hr-chatbots16

chatbot.com/blog/hr-chatbots15

humand.co/en/compare/best-ai-powered-hr-software-tools15

resources.rework.com/tools/ai-tools/best-ai-tools-for-hr-202615

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Workativ Assistant

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workativ Assistant; a claim can dispute any of them.

Workativ 12

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workativ Assistant's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workativ Assistant, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workativ.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.