Every category where a model named Humand for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
HR AI assistants	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	26 of 119	9%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Humand yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Humand across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative15 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Humand is mobile-first and built from the ground up for frontline workers.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · HR AI assistants · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you have a mix of office and warehouse staff: Choose Humand.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · HR AI assistants · comparative prompt · alternative

“Only AI-first HR platform built for both desk and deskless workers” MiniMax M2.5 · HR AI assistants · comparative prompt · alternative

“If your workers don't have corporate laptops: Choose Humand” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR AI assistants · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Humand (AI-first for mixed workforces, 4.9/5 but newer)” Grok 4.1 Fast · HR AI assistants · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Humand, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Humand was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Leena AI17 of 226Not in the top three

Lattice13 of 222Not in the top three

Moveworks12 of 224Not in the top three

Paradox11 of 221Not in the top three

Rippling9 of 221Not in the top three

Workday6 of 221Not in the top three

Workativ Assistant6 of 220Not in the top three

Gusto4 of 221Not in the top three

Eightfold AI4 of 220Not in the top three

SeekOut4 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Humand. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Humand and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

humand.coYour site21

moveworks.com11

gowindmill.com8

wonderchat.io8

workativ.com8

sanalabs.com7

firsthr.app5

hrlineup.com5

peoplebox.ai5

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

Sixty-two of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Humand came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

humand.co/en/compare/best-ai-powered-hr-software-tools21

moveworks.com/us/en/resources/blog/best-ai-assistants-for-hr-efficiency10

gowindmill.com/resources/lists/best-ai-agents-for-hr-teams8

wonderchat.io/blog/top-ai-tools-for-hr-management8

sanalabs.com/agents-blog/hr-ai-agents-work-assistants7

workativ.com/hr/blog/best-ai-agents-for-hr-in-2026-ranked-and-compared6

peoplebox.ai/blog/ai-tools-hr-teams5

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-ai-hr-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Humand

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Humand; a claim can dispute any of them.

Humand (Sammy AI) 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Humand's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Humand, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at humand.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.