HR AI Index
Index Core HR and payroll Workforce scheduling › Homebase vs Connecteam
Workforce scheduling · September 2026 Edition

Homebase vs Connecteam

Zero of twelve models named Homebase first on the direct prompt; zero named Connecteam. Homebase was named by twelve of the twelve models and Connecteam by ten and both carry 25 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.

Homebase

accepted challenger

Named in eleven categories this edition.

Connecteam

accepted challenger

Named in seventeen categories this edition.

First-choice share15%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate12%4%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels2525Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Homebase reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Deputy was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. Deputy vs Homebase · Deputy vs Connecteam · Homebase vs Sling

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workforce scheduling page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HomebaseFirst choices, of twelve modelsConnecteam
Direct001 against Homebase · 1 against Connecteam
Paraphrase111 against Homebase
Comparative11
Budget-constrained631 against Homebase
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Homebase and Connecteam were named in the same answer 208 times, of the 370 answers naming Homebase and the 512 naming Connecteam. In those answers Connecteam took the first choice fifty-seven times and Homebase forty-five.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Homebase and Connecteam stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Homebase Connecteam first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Homebase on the left and Connecteam on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Homebase and Connecteam stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniRippling alternatives: Connecteam, Homebase, When I Work
Grok 4.1 FastADP Workforce Now, Rippling alternatives: Connecteam, Deputy
Mistral SmallPaycor, TimeTrex alternatives: 7shifts, Buddy Punch, Connecteam
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeputy alternatives: ADP Workforce Now, Connecteam, Jobber, When I Work, Workforce.com
GLM 4.7 FlashXDeputy alternatives: Connecteam, Humanity, TimeTrex, When I Work, Workforce.com, Zoho People

Neither was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Paycor alternatives: Buddy Punch, Sling, UKG Pro
Gemini 3.5 FlashAssembled alternatives: Calendly, Chili Piper, Deputy, Float, RevenueHero, Rippling, Runn
Perplexity SonarDeputy alternatives: Rippling, Workforce.com
Llama 4 MaverickTimeTrex
Qwen 3.7 FlashDeputy alternatives: Humanity, Rippling, TimeTrex
Kimi K2Deputy alternatives: Humanity, When I Work
MiniMax M2.5TimeTrex alternatives: Deputy, Humanity, ScheduleAnywhere, When I Work

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Homebase leads by five points.
Homebase43%#1 of 7
Connecteam38%#2 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Homebase leads by six points.
Homebase15%#2 of 9
Connecteam9%#4 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Connecteam leads at enterprise.
Connecteam2%#– of 8
Homebase0%#– of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Homebase

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Sling or Homebase (note: these cap out quickly at mid-scale)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Recommendation: Start with Homebase if you have one location and want time tracking included for free—it's the most balanced for limited budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“When I Work or Homebase are excellent starting points due to their balance of features, ease of use, and affordability” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Connecteam

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“strongest for deskless, field, or mobile-heavy teams, but it may be more than you need if your workforce is not frontline-heavy” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · soft negative
“or Connecteam if you have deskless/field workers and want an all-in-one solution. Both are specifically rated highly for mid-market companies” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.