EasyLlama vs SC Training
One of fourteen models named EasyLlama first on the direct prompt; zero named SC Training. EasyLlama was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and SC Training by twelve and EasyLlama carries 42 labels and SC Training 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the compliance training page.
By framing
EasyLlamaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSC Training
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, EasyLlama and SC Training were named in the same answer twenty-one times, of the 126 answers naming EasyLlama and the 55 naming SC Training. In those answers SC Training took the first choice four times and EasyLlama seven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
EasyLlama SC Training first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, EasyLlama on the left and SC Training on the right.The direct prompt
EasyLlama first, SC Training not the choice
1 of 14 modelsSC Training was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
EasyLlama49%#1 of 10SC Training8%#4 of 10EasyLlama8%#5 of 15SC Training8%#7 of 15EasyLlama2%#11 of 13SC Training—not namedWhat the models said about EasyLlama
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“My top recommendation: EasyLlama at $19.95/user/year offers the best balance of affordability” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“EasyLlama and SC Training are excellent choices for very small teams” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“1. EasyLlama ⭐ *Best Overall for Mid-Market*” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about SC Training
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“likely to be a lightweight platform such as SC Training or Coassemble, which offer straightforward programs and are budget-friendly” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For most small companies with a tight budget, I'd recommend starting with SC Training (EdApp).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“EasyLlama and SC Training are excellent choices for very small teams” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.