Every category where a model named SC Training for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance training	Learning and development	5%	7 of 80	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%
Online course libraries	Learning and development	2%	10 of 73	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	2%	11 of 74	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	2%	10 of 80	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	2%	12 of 116	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SC Training yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SC Training across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	1	1	4
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained25 labels10

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative56 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SC Training (formerly EdApp) stands out as one of the best employee coaching platforms due to its robust free plan with unlimited users” Grok 4.1 Fast · Coaching platforms · budget prompt · first choice

“If you have 0 budget: Go with EdApp. It gets you the furthest ahead with zero financial risk.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning management syst · budget prompt · first choice

“EdApp is widely considered the best budget-friendly option because it offers a generous free tier” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice

“or SafetyCulture/EdApp (if budget is extremely tight). Both scale affordably as you grow.” Kimi K2 · Learning experience plat · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SC Training, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SC Training was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TalentLMS36 of 5310Not in the top three

GoSkills26 of 5316Not in the top three

360Learning26 of 531Not in the top three

Docebo18 of 530Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand16 of 530Not in the top three

Degreed16 of 530Not in the top three

EasyLlama15 of 535Not in the top three

iSpring Learn12 of 530Not in the top three

Coggno10 of 532Not in the top three

Moodle7 of 531Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SC Training. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 53 answers that named SC Training and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app24

goskills.com21

compliquest.com15

continu.com14

group.app14

valamis.com14

g2.com13

coggno.com12

intelligentliving.co12

360learning.com9

148 of the 148 domain citations in answers naming SC Training came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

compliquest.com/en/blog/best-compliance-training-platforms-compared-202615

continu.com/software/best-compliance-training-software14

firsthr.app/compare/training/lxp-learning-platform14

goskills.com/resources/learning-experience-platforms12

intelligentliving.co/best-lxp-platforms-small-businesses12

valamis.com/blog/best-compliance-training-software12

goskills.com/resources/affordable-lms11

group.app/blog/learning-experience-platforms11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SC Training

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SC Training; a claim can dispute any of them.

SC Training (formerly EdApp) 6EdApp 4SC Training (SafetyCulture) 2SC Training (EdApp) 1SC Training/EdApp 1SafetyCulture Training (formerly EdApp) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SC Training's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SC Training, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at safetyculture.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.