HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Coggno · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Coggno

70Judge labels
16First choices
0Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Compliance training for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 80 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 21 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Coggno for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Compliance trainingLearning and development12%4 of 800%21accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Coggno yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Coggno across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512104
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar02002
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick11103
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K211103
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.512003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels1
Paraphrase13 labels2
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained26 labels12
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative4 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative70 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Coggno: Provides 10,000+ pre-built compliance courses, HRIS sync, and state-specific harassment versions in a single per-seat subscription.” Llama 4 Maverick · Compliance training · direct prompt · first choice
“If you have zero budget for software and just need to buy a few specific compliance courses: Go with Coggno.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
“Coggno gives you the best combination of price, ready-made content, and essential reporting features.” MiniMax M2.5 · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice
“Coggno stands out as an excellent choice for budget-conscious companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Coggno, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coggno was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
EasyLlama38 of 7011Not in the top three
TalentLMS33 of 709Not in the top three
Traliant24 of 709Not in the top three
NAVEX19 of 705Not in the top three
Absorb LMS17 of 701Not in the top three
Cornerstone OnDemand14 of 700Not in the top three
BizLibrary13 of 706Not in the top three
iSpring Learn11 of 700Not in the top three
Emtrain10 of 702Not in the top three
SC Training10 of 701Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coggno. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 70 answers that named Coggno and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coggno's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coggno, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coggno.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.