Every category where a model named iSpring Learn for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance training	Learning and development	2%	10 of 80	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	0%	12 of 74	0%	14	accepted challenger
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	16 of 73	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	0%	27 of 86	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22%
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	22 of 80	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for iSpring Learn yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated iSpring Learn across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	1	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	2	3
Mistral Small	0	3	1	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	3	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	2	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	4	3	8
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels2

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative33 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained32 labels4

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative8 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative106 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“TalentLMS or iSpring Learn are the best starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Compliance training · budget prompt · first choice

“Start with iSpring Learn as your LMS (for internal training and compliance tracking) and add LinkedIn Learning as your content library” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Online course libraries · direct prompt · alternative

“Excellent audit trails, authoring tools. Good for structured compliance but pricier per user than free tiers.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Compliance training · budget prompt · alternative

“A good option if you already create training in PowerPoint and need strong mobile and offline capabilities.” Mistral Small · Online course libraries · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as iSpring Learn, over the 105 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iSpring Learn was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TalentLMS96 of 10545Not in the top three

360Learning49 of 1053Not in the top three

Docebo35 of 1051Not in the top three

Absorb LMS32 of 1050Not in the top three

GoSkills29 of 1057Not in the top three

LearnUpon29 of 1052Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand28 of 1052Not in the top three

Moodle27 of 1051Not in the top three

Connecteam26 of 1051Not in the top three

SAP Litmos19 of 1050Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iSpring Learn. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 96 of the 105 answers that named iSpring Learn and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goskills.com49

capterra.com35

peoplemanagingpeople.com33

forbes.com28

docebo.com27

ispring.comYour site27

g2.com26

continu.com25

proprofstraining.com25

valamis.com24

272 of the 299 domain citations in answers naming iSpring Learn came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-small-business29

capterra.com/resources/best-lms-for-small-business26

forbes.com/advisor/business/the-best-learning-management-systems26

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-lms-for-small-business24

valamis.com/blog/best-compliance-training-software22

goskills.com/resources/affordable-lms17

hrkonnect.com/feeds/blog/small-business-learning-management-system17

continu.com/software/best-compliance-training-software16

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as iSpring Learn

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as iSpring Learn; a claim can dispute any of them.

iSpring LMS 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iSpring Learn's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iSpring Learn, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ispring.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.