HR AI Index
Index Vendors › SAP Litmos · September 2026 Edition
SAP · 3 categories · Ranked

SAP Litmos

69Judge labels
3First choices
15Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Learning management syst for enterprise buyers
Rank 14 of 86 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In course authoring tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP Litmos for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Course authoring toolsLearning and development2%14 of 860%3under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22%
Learning management systemsLearning and development0%14 of 748%12accepted challenger
Compliance trainingLearning and development0%19 of 800%6under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP Litmos yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP Litmos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash01102
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00505
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash00202
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200112
GLM 4.7 FlashX02103
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels1
Paraphrase12 labels2
Comparative19 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative69 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Absorb LMS and Litmos are excellent for comprehensive training needs” Mistral Small · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Litmos - a popular eLearning authoring tool that is suitable for mid-market and enterprise teams delivering compliance training” Llama 4 Maverick · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · alternative
“Designed for organizations that need to roll out employee training quickly with minimal setup” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Learning management syst · direct prompt · alternative
“compliance content plus broader learning content: BizLibrary or Litmos” Perplexity Sonar · Compliance training · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“"Compliance over usability" design; poor Trustpilot reviews; recurring billing/cancellation complaints” Kimi K2 · Learning management syst · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP Litmos, over the 69 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Litmos was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Absorb LMS52 of 6910Not in the top three
Docebo50 of 6915Not in the top three
Cornerstone OnDemand39 of 693Not in the top three
TalentLMS37 of 6911Not in the top three
360Learning37 of 692Not in the top three
iSpring Learn19 of 693Not in the top three
LearnUpon19 of 690Not in the top three
Moodle19 of 690Not in the top three
Workday Learning12 of 690Not in the top three
SAP SuccessFactors Learning11 of 691Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Litmos. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 69 answers that named SAP Litmos and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docebo.com28
learn.g2.com24
talentlms.com20
g2.com19
d2l.com18
intellum.com17
capterra.com16
peoplemanagingpeople.com16
elearningindustry.com15
goskills.com15

188 of the 188 domain citations in answers naming SAP Litmos came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SAP Litmos

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Litmos; a claim can dispute any of them.
Litmos 13Litmos (SAP Litmos) 1Litmos (formerly SAP Litmos) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Litmos's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Litmos, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack