| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 2% | 14 of 86 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22% |
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 0% | 14 of 74 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 0% | 19 of 80 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Absorb LMS and Litmos are excellent for comprehensive training needs” Mistral Small · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Litmos - a popular eLearning authoring tool that is suitable for mid-market and enterprise teams delivering compliance training” Llama 4 Maverick · Course authoring tools · direct prompt · alternative
“Designed for organizations that need to roll out employee training quickly with minimal setup” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Learning management syst · direct prompt · alternative
“compliance content plus broader learning content: BizLibrary or Litmos” Perplexity Sonar · Compliance training · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"Compliance over usability" design; poor Trustpilot reviews; recurring billing/cancellation complaints” Kimi K2 · Learning management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 69 answers that named SAP Litmos and are not a share of its labels.
188 of the 188 domain citations in answers naming SAP Litmos came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Litmos's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Litmos, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.