Every category where a model named Workday Learning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	79 of 80	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Workday Learning yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Workday Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative16 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid buying an LXP just because it's bundled with your HR suite (SAP, Workday, etc.)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · hard negative

“it is widely considered one of the weakest modules in the Workday suite... personalization is shallow, the reporting is clunky” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative

“Mixed-to-negative feedback from administrators” Kimi K2 · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Workday Learning, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Workday Learning was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cornerstone OnDemand41 of 453Not in the top three

Docebo36 of 4510Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors Learning26 of 451Not in the top three

Absorb LMS23 of 453Not in the top three

Moodle18 of 450Not in the top three

TalentLMS16 of 455Not in the top three

360Learning14 of 451Not in the top three

SAP Litmos12 of 450Not in the top three

iSpring Learn8 of 453Not in the top three

LearnUpon7 of 450Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Workday Learning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 45 answers that named Workday Learning and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docebo.com18

d2l.com11

elearningindustry.com11

talentlms.com11

g2.com9

goskills.com9

aibusinessgeek.com8

companylms.com8

intellum.com8

paylocity.com8

101 of the 101 domain citations in answers naming Workday Learning came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aibusinessgeek.com/articles/ai-learning-management-systems-20268

intellum.com/resources/blog/best-enterprise-lms-platforms8

paylocity.com/why-paylocity/compare/lists/enterprise-learning-management-system8

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/best-learning-management-system7

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/docebo-vs-cornerstone6

stylelearn.com/the-worst-lms-in-the-world-is6

d2l.com/blog/enterprise-learning-management-system5

g2.com/products/cornerstone-ondemand-cornerstone-ondemand/reviews5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Workday Learning

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Workday Learning; a claim can dispute any of them.

Workday 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Workday Learning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Workday Learning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.