Every category where a model named 360Learning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	15%	2 of 80	0%	44	accepted challenger
Learning management systems	Learning and development	5%	4 of 74	6%	31	accepted challenger
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	4%	8 of 116	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	3%	9 of 86	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22%
Online course libraries	Learning and development	0%	18 of 73	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%
Compliance training	Learning and development	0%	21 of 80	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%
HR AI assistants	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	30 of 119	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Workativ Assistant at 12%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	37 of 162	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 360Learning yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 360Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	3	1	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	2	4	0	1	7
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	4	1	0	7
Perplexity Sonar	1	3	3	0	7
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	4	5	0	9
Mistral Small	2	3	4	0	9
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	5	5	1	12
Llama 4 Maverick	1	2	4	0	7
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	6	1	0	7
Kimi K2	1	8	1	0	10
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	7	4	0	13
MiniMax M2.5	3	3	3	0	9

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct54 labels4

Paraphrase47 labels7

Comparative90 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained30 labels5

Scale-constrained30 labels4

Negative15 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative266 labels in all, every segment counted; 20 of the 25 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“My single recommendation: For most mid-sized B2B companies, I'd start with 360Learning if it's mainly internal training” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Course authoring tools · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“### 1. 360Learning Best for: Collaborative learning, sales enablement, and peer-to-peer knowledge sharing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“360Learning and GoSkills are often highlighted as the best affordable learning experience platforms” Mistral Small · Learning experience plat · budget prompt · first choice

“Look at agile, mid-market-focused platforms like 360Learning, Learn Amp, Continu, or Absorb.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it's ~5x more expensive than TalentLMS and requires a more mature L&D culture to be effective” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning management syst · direct prompt · soft negative

“but it may be less budget-friendly as your headcount grows” GPT-5.4 mini · Learning management syst · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 360Learning, over the 266 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 360Learning was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docebo159 of 26631Not in the top three

TalentLMS108 of 26634Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand107 of 2665Not in the top three

Absorb LMS103 of 2669Not in the top three

Degreed80 of 26616Not in the top three

GoSkills71 of 26634Compare →

LearnUpon52 of 2667Not in the top three

iSpring Learn49 of 2665Not in the top three

LinkedIn Learning44 of 2665Not in the top three

Udemy Business38 of 2661Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 360Learning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 233 of the 266 answers that named 360Learning and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goskills.com113

360learning.comYour site99

g2.com77

docebo.com76

peoplemanagingpeople.com65

elearningindustry.com55

ispring.com55

proprofstraining.com52

digitalhumans.com50

firsthr.app47

590 of the 689 domain citations in answers naming 360Learning came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goskills.com/resources/learning-experience-platforms69

digitalhumans.com/blog/the-10-best-learning-experience-platforms-lxp-reviewed-for-202650

360learning.com/blog/learning-experience-platforms39

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-compared38

group.app/blog/learning-experience-platforms34

proprofstraining.com/blog/b2b-lms34

talentedladiesclub.com/articles/articles-learning-experience-platforms-comparison-guide-2034

ispring.com/knowledge-hub/learning-experience-platforms31

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as 360Learning

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as 360Learning; a claim can dispute any of them.

360 Learning 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 360Learning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 360Learning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 360learning.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.