8 categories · RankedDocebo
320Judge labels
51First choices
73Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
8Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
44% in Learning management syst for enterprise buyers
Rank 4 of 80 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 37 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business64 of 65
0%30 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market4 of 80
11%37 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise1 of 61
32%50 labels
endorsed leader
In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Docebo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning experience platforms | Learning and development | 11% | 4 of 80 | 14% | 37 | accepted challenger |
| Learning management systems | Learning and development | 5% | 5 of 74 | 15% | 33 | accepted challenger |
| Internal talent marketplace | Performance and talent management | 0% | 22 of 129 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26% |
| Online course libraries | Learning and development | 0% | 20 of 73 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32% |
| Course authoring tools | Learning and development | 0% | 28 of 86 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22% |
| Compliance training | Learning and development | 0% | 26 of 80 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22% |
| Skills intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 36 of 162 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19% |
| Employee onboarding | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 80 of 104 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BambooHR at 29% |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Docebo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated Docebo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 14 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 12 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 12 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct57 labels16
Paraphrase78 labels29
Comparative72 labels9not counted in share
Budget-constrained38 labels5
Scale-constrained36 labels1
Negative39 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative320 labels in all, every segment counted; 51 of the 63 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The Best All-Around Enterprise-Grade LMS: Docebo ... Go with Docebo if you want a future-proof platform that grows with you.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning management syst · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Litmos and Docebo are often highlighted for their scalability, ease of integration, and comprehensive feature sets” Mistral Small · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Docebo or Continu if you are an enterprise seeking AI-driven personalization and scalability.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · first choice
“Docebo is the industry leader.... Best for External Customer & Partner Training (Extended Enterprise)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid enterprise LXPs (Degreed, Docebo, Cornerstone, Learnerbly, Skillsoft)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning experience plat · budget prompt · hard negative
“Docebo is highly rated for corporate training, but it is often a trap for mid-sized or growing businesses that want custom-tailored user interfaces.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
“Docebo can be incredibly expensive... admins frequently complain about system bugs following platform updates” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative
“heavily enterprise-focused. They typically operate on quote-only pricing with minimum license requirements” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Docebo, over the 320 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Docebo was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Docebo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 258 of the 320 answers that named Docebo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
docebo.comYour site132
goskills.com98
g2.com83
360learning.com76
peoplemanagingpeople.com61
d2l.com56
elearningindustry.com54
ispring.com54
proprofstraining.com51
talentlms.com50
583 of the 715 domain citations in answers naming Docebo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Docebo
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Docebo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Docebo (with 365Talents) 1Docebo + 365Talents 1Docebo LMS 1Docebo Learn 1Docebu 1
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Docebo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Docebo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at docebo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.