Every category where a model named Degreed for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	14 of 80	30%	27	criticized challenger
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	30 of 162	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%
Talent intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	38 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Degreed yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Degreed across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	2	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	3	5
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	0	1	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	4	1	5
Mistral Small	0	0	3	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	3	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	3	1	6
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels4

Paraphrase25 labels4

Comparative44 labels12not counted in share

Budget-constrained14 labels1

Scale-constrained17 labels1

Negative19 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative135 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 23 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For | Enterprise skills intelligence, self-directed development ... Massive skill graph (30,000+ skills) and 800+ integrations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Learning experience plat · comparative prompt · first choice

“Degreed — Best for skills-first upskilling ... The leading "pure" LXP focused on skills-based learning for enterprises.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning experience plat · comparative prompt · first choice

“Currently widely considered the market leader in terms of pure "experience." Degreed is famous for its consumer-grade design” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning experience plat · comparative prompt · first choice

“Degreed is often used as an enterprise skills layer that aggregates learning and workforce data across systems.” Perplexity Sonar · Skills intelligence · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Do not buy a "pure" LXP (like Degreed...) ... Avoid heavy enterprise-only giants like Cornerstone or Degreed” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · scale prompt · hard negative

“Avoid enterprise LXPs (Degreed, Docebo, Cornerstone, Learnerbly, Skillsoft)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Learning experience plat · budget prompt · hard negative

“Users frequently report "feed fatigue."... Degreed can quickly devolve into an overwhelming, unguided mess of external web links.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative

“Industry leaders like Degreed, Docebo, and Cornerstone (formerly EdCast) are heavily enterprise-focused... steep contract floors” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Degreed, over the 135 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Degreed was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docebo86 of 13514Not in the top three

360Learning80 of 1357Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand76 of 1352Not in the top three

GoSkills36 of 13519Not in the top three

LinkedIn Learning34 of 1351Not in the top three

Udemy Business30 of 1352Not in the top three

Fuel5024 of 1351Not in the top three

Eightfold AI23 of 1353Not in the top three

Gloat22 of 1356Not in the top three

Skillsoft Percipio22 of 1350Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Degreed. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 105 of the 135 answers that named Degreed and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goskills.com61

g2.com43

360learning.com41

digitalhumans.com40

group.app33

peoplemanagingpeople.com32

docebo.com30

talentedladiesclub.com29

firsthr.app28

cloudshare.com24

361 of the 361 domain citations in answers naming Degreed came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goskills.com/resources/learning-experience-platforms58

digitalhumans.com/blog/the-10-best-learning-experience-platforms-lxp-reviewed-for-202640

360learning.com/blog/learning-experience-platforms30

talentedladiesclub.com/articles/articles-learning-experience-platforms-comparison-guide-2029

group.app/blog/learning-experience-platforms28

cloudshare.com/blog/best-learning-experience-platforms24

ispring.com/knowledge-hub/learning-experience-platforms22

firsthr.app/compare/training/lxp-learning-platform21

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Degreed's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Degreed, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at degreed.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.